2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 5155
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
– Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
##PAGE1##
H.C.P.(MD)No.1322 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.02.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA
H.C.P.(MD)No.1322 of 2025
Sujinkumar ... Petitioner
-vs-
1. The Secretary to Government,
Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,
Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The District Collector and District Magistrate,
Kanyakumari District
at Nagercoil
3.The Inspector of Police
All Women Police Station
Marthandam,
Kanyakumari District
4. The Superintendent of Prison
Central Prison
Palayamkottai ... Respondents
____________
Page 1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 06:32:50 pm )
##PAGE2##H.C.P.(MD)No.1322 of 2025
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the
entire records pertaining to the order of detention passed by the
second respondent in proceedings in PD No.12 of 2025 dated
24.04.2025 and quash the same as illegal and produce the detenu
namely Sujinkumar, S/o.Rajan, aged about 31 years now he is
confined in Central Prison,Palayamkottai before this Court and set
him at liberty forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.
The petitioner is the detenu viz., Sujinkumar,
S/o.Rajan, aged about 31 years. The detenu has been detained by
the second respondent by his order in detention order in PD No.12
of 2025 dated 24.04.2025 holding him to be a "sexual offeder", as
____________
Page 2 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 06:32:50 pm )
##PAGE3##H.C.P.(MD)No.1322 of 2025
contemplated under Section 2(ggg) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.
The said order is under challenge in this habeas corpus petition.
2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing
for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced
by the Detaining Authority.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
raised only one ground that the detenu was served with illegible
copy of Accident Register annexed in page page No.31 and 33.
4. A perusal of the record reveals that the detenu was
served with clear copy of Accident Register annexed in page page
No.31 and 33 at page no. 35
____________
Page 3 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 06:32:50 pm )
##PAGE4##H.C.P.(MD)No.1322 of 2025
5. In view of the same, this Court finds no infirmity or
illegality in the order passed by the second respondent, hence the
petition stands dismissed.
[G.K.I., J.] [R.P., J.]
03.02.2026
NCC :Yes/No
Index: Yes/No
Internet: Yes/No
aav
To
1. The Secretary to Government,
Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,
Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The District Collector and District Magistrate,
Kanyakumari District
at Nagercoil
3.The Inspector of Police
All Women Police Station
Marthandam,
Kanyakumari District
____________
Page 4 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 06:32:50 pm )
##PAGE5##H.C.P.(MD)No.1322 of 2025
4. The Superintendent of Prison
Central Prison
Palayamkottai
5.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
____________
Page 5 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 06:32:50 pm )
##PAGE6##H.C.P.(MD)No.1322 of 2025
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.
AND
R. POORNIMA,J.
aav
H.C.P.(MD)No.1322 of 2025
03.02.2026
____________
Page 6 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 06:32:50 pm )