IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice T. VINOD KUMAR
Dr.Manikandan Rajagopal – Appellant
Versus
All India Council for Technical Education – Respondent
##PAGE1##
W.P.No.25115 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.02.2026
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
W.P.No.25115 of 2021
and WMP.Nos.26466, 26467 and 26468 of 2021
Dr.Manikandan Rajagopal ... Petitioner
vs
All India Council for Technical Education
Rep by its Member Secretary
Ministry of Education,
Government of India
Nelson Mandela Marg
Vasant Kuni
New Delhi – 110 070. … Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to cal for the records pertaining
to the public notice in No.F.2-33/2020-21/AdminE/Rectt.Gr A, B & C/dated
12.11.2021 issued by the respondent and quash the same and direct the respondent
to consider the name of the petitioner for interview to the post of Additional
Director.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arasu Sanga Tamil
for Mr.K.S.Karthik Raja
For Respondent : Mr.B.Rabu Manohar, SCGC
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned
counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the records.
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/02/2026 04:22:38 pm )
##PAGE2##W.P.No.25115 of 2021
2.The petitioner by the present writ petition has assailed the action of the
respondent in not considering the appointment of the petitioner to the post of
Additional Director of the respondent, pursuant to the advertisement caused by the
respondent to fill up the vacancies by way of direct recruitment under
Advertisement No.Admin.(Estt.)/02(01)2021 dated 12.02.2021.
3. The petitioner contended that under the aforesaid advertisement
applications have been called for to fill up various vacancies including that of
Assistant Director in the pay matrix Level-11 as per 7th CPC, numbering to 13
vacancies and that the petitioner being eligible to the post of Assistant Director,
had applied to the same; and that the respondent by the public notice dated
12.11.2021 had rejected his application with remarks “Less experience as per RR.
Not Recommended”.
4. The petitioner contended as per the advertisement caused by the
respondent, the required experience is 8 years of service at Teaching or Research,
Educational planning or Administration, Training; and that as he had worked as
2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/02/2026 04:22:38 pm )
##PAGE3##W.P.No.25115 of 2021
lecturer in Karunya University during the period between 2010-2015, and
thereafter having worked at RAMP IT (an I.T. Company between 2015-2017) he
has fulfilled the eligibility criteria of having teaching experience of 4 years, as
specified in the advertisement. Thus, the rejection of his candidature by the
respondent is illegal, arbitrary and he is liable to be appointed as Assistant
Director.
5. The respondent filed counter affidavit.
6. The respondent by the counter affidavit contended that the petitioner
did not have the requisite experience as per the advertisement caused for filling up
the vacancy of Assistant Director post and as such experience of the petitioner was
not considered.
7. I have taken note of the respective contentions urged.
8. Though it is vehemently contended on behalf of the petitioner of he
having required experience of 8 years of service out of which 4 years of teaching,
3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/02/2026 04:22:38 pm )
##PAGE4##W.P.No.25115 of 2021
it is pertinent to note that the relevant Clause of experience mentioned in the
advertisement reads as under :-
“Experience : Eight years experience at supervisory
level out of which, at least four years experience in Teaching or
Research, Educational planning or Administration, Training in
Central or State Government or University or other institutions
of higher education or Autonomous Bodies or PSUs.”
(Underlining supplied by Court)
9. A reading of the above clause in the advertisement dealing with
experience specifies that the required experience of eight years should be at
supervisory level, out of which at least 4 year experience should be in teaching or
research
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.