SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 5210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
R.Vasantha – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent



##PAGE1##

WP No. 2764 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03-02-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

WP No. 2764 of 2026

1. R.Vasantha

Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector

Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

2.The District Revenue Officer

Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer

Chengalpattu Taluk and District.

4.The Tahsildar

Chengalpattu Taluk and District.

5.Chinnaraj

6.Ranganathan

Respondent(s)

PRAYER

Directing the Respondents to consider and dispose of the Petitioners

representation dated 03.11.2025, by deleting the land in survey No.98/3,

Karunilam Village,measuring 0.24.50 hectares, from Patta No.218 standing in

the name of Late. Mr. Balaraman Pillai, and issue a separate Patta in favour of

the Petitioner and other legal heirs within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Senthilkumar

For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt

Advocate For R1 to R4

R5 and R6-N D/w

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 05/02/2026 03:21:39 pm )

##PAGE2##

WP No. 2764 of 2026

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to cancel patta No.218 for the property

morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition standing in the name of

the father of the respondents 5 and 6, one late Balaraman Pillai based on the

petitioner’s representation dated 03.11.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by

this Court.

2. The petitioner claims that the father of the respondents 5 and 6 was

erroneously and illegally issued patta No.218 for the property morefully

described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner seeks for cancellation

of patta No.218 standing in the name of one late Balaraman Pillai, who is the

father of the respondents 5 and 6. Since the petitioner’s representation dated

03.11.2025, seeking for cancellation of patta No.218 standing in the name of

late Balaraman Pillai, was not considered by the third respondent, the petitioner

has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr. R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice

on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse orders are passed against

the respondents 5 and 6, notice to the respondents 5 and 6 is dispensed with by

this Court.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s

representation dated 03.11.2025, seeking for cancellation of patta No.218

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 05/02/2026 03:21:39 pm )

##PAGE3##

WP No. 2764 of 2026

standing in the name of one late Balaraman Pillai, who is the father of the

respondents 5 and 6, is considered on merits and in accordance with law after

hearing the objections of the respondents 5 and 6 as well as any other third party

whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be

fixed by this Court.

5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the

petitioner’s representation.

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to

pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s

representation dated 03.11.2025, seeking for cancellation of patta No.218,

standing in the name of late Balaraman Pillai, who is the father of the

respondents 5 and 6 for the property morefully described in the prayer to this

writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order after hearing the objections of the respondents 5 and 6 as well as

any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.

03-02-2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 05/02/2026 03:21:39 pm )

##PAGE4##

WP No. 2764 of 2026

Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes

Neutral Citation:Yes/No

ab

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 05/02/2026 03:21:39 pm )

##PAGE5##

WP No. 2764 of 2026

WP No. 2764 of 2026

To

1.The District Collector

Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

2.The District Revenue Officer

Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer

Chengalpattu Taluk and District.

4.The Tahsildar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top