2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 5262
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
BASKAR SELVAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner o – Respondent
##PAGE1##
W.P.(MD)No.2625 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.02.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.(MD)No.2625 of 2026
& W.M.P(MD)No.2210 of 2026
Baskar Selvakumar
Proprietor of M/s. Vettri Vinayagar Electrical Works
No. 1G, Main Road
Vallioor-627 117 Tirunelveli District
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise,
No.7-Tractor Road, NGO A Colony
Tirunelveli-627007
2. The Joint Commissioner of (Appeals)
Central Revenue Buildings
Bibukulam, Madurai-625002
... Respondents
Prayer:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in respect of
impugned Order dated 24-11-2025 vide DIN. 20251159XO0000444A96
Rectification of Order-in-Original No.29/AC/GST/2025 dated
28-10-2025 under Section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017 in
GEXCOM/ADJN/850/CGST/DIV/TNVL/COMMRTE MADURAI
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 08:35:41 pm )
##PAGE2##W.P.(MD)No.2625 of 2026
along GST with of Summary DRC-08 Rectification/Withdrawal Order
dated 24-11-2025 passed by the First Respondent and Quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.Renganathan S
For Respondent : Mr.R.Gowri Shankar
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging impugned order dated
24.11.2025 passed by the respondent.
2. Mr.R.Gowri Shankar, learned counsel, takes notice on behalf of
the respondents.
3. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for
disposal at the admission stage itself.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
provisions of Sections 73 & 74 of the GST Act stood omitted with effect
from 01.04.2024 and only the provisions of Section 74A of the GST Act
will apply for the financial years 2024-2025 onwards. However, without
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 08:35:41 pm )
##PAGE3##W.P.(MD)No.2625 of 2026
considering the same, in the present case, which is pertaining to the
financial year 2024-2025, the respondent had issued the show cause
notice under Section 74 of the GST Act and subsequently, passed the
impugned assessment order without any jurisdiction. Hence, he requests
this Court to set aside the impugned order passed by the respondent.
5. In reply, the learned Additional Government Pleader had fairly
admitted the submissions made by the petitioner and submitted that the
proceedings were wrongly invoked under Section 74 instead of Section
74A. Hence, he requests this Court to set aside the order and remand
back this matter to the 1st respondent.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
counsel for the respondents and also perused the entire materials
available on record.
7. In this case, as rightly contended by the petitioner, the
provisions of Sections 73 & 74 of the GST Act stood omitted with effect
from 01.04.2024 and only the provisions of Section 74A of the GST Act
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 08:35:41 pm )
##PAGE4##W.P.(MD)No.2625 of 2026
will apply from the financial years 2024-2025 onwards. Hence, it is clear
that the show cause notice and assessment order dated 28.10.2025 came
to be passed without any jurisdiction. Thereafter, the said aspect was
rectified vide the impugned order dated 24.11.2025 without providing
any opportunity to the petitioner. In such view of the matter, this Court is
inclined to set aside the impugned order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the
1st respondent. Further, to avoid any further delay and inconvenience to
both the parties, this Court is inclined to direct the petitioner to treat the
impugned assessment order as a notice issued under Section 74A of the
GST Act and file reply to the same.
8. Accordingly, this Court passes the following order:-
(i) The impugned order dated 24.11.2025 is set
aside and the matter is remanded to the respondent for
fresh consideration
(ii) The petitioner is directed to treat the
impugned order dated 24.11.2025 as a notice issued
under Section 74A and file their reply/objection alon