IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Tamil Selvi – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
##PAGE1##
W.P.(MD) No.2897 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.02.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
W.P.(MD) No.2897 of 2026
and
W.M.P.(MD) Nos.2387 & 2388 of 2026
Tamil Selvi ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
rep.by its Principal Secretary
to the Government
Revenue Department
Secretariat, Fort St.George
Chennai
2.The Principal Secretary /
The Commissioner of
Land Administration
Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai
3.The District Collector
Virudhunagar District
Virudhunagar
4.The District Revenue Officer
Virudhunagar District
Virudhunagar
____________
Page 1 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 08:35:41 pm )
##PAGE2##W.P.(MD) No.2897 of 2026
5.The Revenue Divisional Officer
Aruppukottai
Virudhunagar District
6.The Tahsildar
Office of the Tahsildar
Aruppukottai Taluk
Virudhunagar District
7.T.R.Rajan ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue
a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the impugned order in
Na.Ka.No.T3/12229785/2025 dated 14.01.2026 issued by the 2nd respondent
and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Senior Counsel
for Mr.B.Arun
For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan
Special Government Pleader for R1 to R6
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]
Mr.S.P.Maharajan, learned Special Government Pleader, takes
notice for the respondents 1 to 6.
____________
Page 2 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 08:35:41 pm )
##PAGE3##W.P.(MD) No.2897 of 2026
2. The petitioner herein, who is found to have encroached upon a
public land classified as “Cart Track”, was issued with a notice of eviction of
encroachment under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act,
1905. Challenging the same, earlier, the petitioner herein approached this
Court by filing a writ petition in W.P.(MD) No.6263 of 2025, wherein this
Court, by an order dated 13.06.2025, dismissed the said writ petition. The
relevant portion of the said order is extracted hereunder:
“6.Since the statutory appeal is permitted,
there is no impediment for the petitioner to prefer
an appeal before the Commissioner of Land
Administration to test the correctness of the order
passed by the District Revenue Officer,
Virudhanagar. However, the High Court in exercise
of the powers of judicial review cannot adjudicate
the disputed facts when the efficacious statutory
remedy is contemplated.
7. Adjudication of the facts by the Appellate
Authorities are of paramount important, which
would be a greater assistance to the High Court for
the purpose of exercise the powers of judicial
review in an effective manner.
8.Granting liberty to the petitioner to approach
the appellate authority, the present writ petition
____________
Page 3 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 08:35:41 pm )
##PAGE4##W.P.(MD) No.2897 of 2026
stands dismissed. In the event of preferring an
appeal, the period during which the writ petition
was pending before the High Court, is to be taken
into consideration for the purpose of condoning the
delay if any. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, the connected miscellaneous
petitions are closed.”
3. Pursuant to the above said liberty granted to the petitioner, she
filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Land Administration. Even though
there was a delay on the part of the petitioner in filing the appeal before the
authority concerned, she had not filed any application seeking condonation of
delay. In the said circumstances, the Commissioner of Land Administration,
by the impugned order dated 14.01.2026, dismissed the appeal preferred by
the petitioner herein on the ground of delay as the appeal was filed beyond the
period of one month. Aggrieved by the dismissal of her appeal, the petitioner
has filed the present writ petition.
4. A perusal of the records shows that the direction to the
petitioner to approach the Commissioner of Land Administration was issued
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.