SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 5346

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
SRI BALAJI GRANITES – Appellant
Versus
S.MOHAN KUMAR – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.02.2026 CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA M/s.Sri Balaji Granites, Proprietor, M.Arunvel Kumar, No.69, 2nd Main Road, VGP Layout, 3rd Part, Palavakkam, Chennai – 600 041. ... Petitioner Vs.

S.Mohan Kumar ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Y.Kajanavas

O R D E R

This matter has been listed today under the caption “for being mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. It is submitted that this Court, vide order dated 27.01.2026, disposed of the present petition and directed the petitioner to deposit 10 % of the compensation amount before the trial Court within a period of six weeks from 28.01.2026. However, in the order copy, the period stipulated by this Court has been inadvertently mentioned as four weeks instead of six weeks.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J .

ham

3. Therefore, the Registry is directed to effect the necessary correction in paragraph 7 of the order dated 27.01.2026 by substituting the period of four weeks with six weeks and thereafter, issue a fresh copy of the order.

02.02.2026 ham To The XVIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Sri Balaji Granites, Proprietor, M.Arunvel Kumar, No.69, 2nd Main Road, VGP Layout, 3rd Part, Palavakkam, Chennai - 600 041.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs S.Mohan Kumar ..Respondent(s)

Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to set aside and modify the conditional order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.3 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1435 of 2025 dated 01.12.2025 that the Petitioner shall deposit 20 percentage of the total compensation amount to the credit of CC Number on the file of the trial court within 60 days from the date of this order.

For Petitioner : Mr.Y.Kajanavas

ORDER

The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside and modify the conditional order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.3 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1435 of 2025 dated 01.12.2025 that the Petitioner shall deposit 20 percentage of the total compensation amount to the credit of CC Number on the file of the trial court within 60 days from the date of this order.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows :-

2.1.The complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed by the respondent against the petitioner before the learned XXVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, in C.C.No.2903 of 2020.

2.2. On 20.11.2025, the trial Court found the petitioner/accused guilty, convicted him and sentenced him to undergo one year simple imprisonment and further directed him to pay the cheque amount of Rs.9,25,00,000/- as compensation, in default to undergo 30 days simple imprisonment.

2.3. Against the said judgment, the petitioner preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.1435 of 2025 along with a petition in Crl.M.P.No.3 of 2025 seeking suspension of sentence. On 01.12.2025, the XVIII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, while suspending the sentence imposed on the petitioner, directed him to deposit 20 % of the compensation amount before the trial Court within sixty days from the date of the said order. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition has been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has a good and meritorious case in appeal. Apart from that the petitioner finds it difficult to raise the huge amount and hence, the present petition has been filed to modify the conditional order to deposit the 20% compensation amount. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to deposit the modified amount within a time frame to be fixed by this court.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record, this Court is of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top