SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 5430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Sivasubramani – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2026 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA H.C.P.(MD)No.94 of 2026 Sivasubramani ... Petitioner -vs-

1.The Superintendent of Police Thoothukudi District Thoothukudi

2.The Inspector of Police Nalatinputhur Police Station, Thoothukudi Thoothukudi Disrict ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the person or body of the petitioner's wife the detenue namely Keerthika, w/o.Sivasubramani, D/o.Aarumugapandi aged about 24 years before this Court and set her at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Poornachandran For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

This Habeus Corpus Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to produce the person or body of the petitioner's wife the detenue namely Keerthika, w/o.Sivasubramani, D/o.Aarumugapandi aged about 24 years before this Court and set her at liberty.

2. The petitioner got married one the detenue and living together.

While being so, she was missing from the matrimonial home on 18.01.2026, therefore the petitioner lodged complaint before the second respondent and the same has been registered in Crime No.28 of 2026 under 'Woman missing'. During investigation the detenue made statement before the second respondent that due to mis understanding between herself and the petitioner she on her own volition left the matrimonial home. Further when she approached her parents they compelled her to live with the petitioner, since the petitioner is a rich person. Further she stated that she does not want to go either with the petitioner herein or her parents. Now she is residing in Coimbatore on her own.

3. A perusal of the record reveals by the second respondent that the alleged detenue is not under illegal detention of any one.

4. In view of the same, the petition stands dismissed.

[G.K.I., J.] [R.P., J.]

02.02.2026 aav To

1.The Superintendent of Police Thoothukudi District Thoothukudi

2.The Inspector of Police Nalatinputhur Police Station, Thoothukudi,Thoothukudi Disrict 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J .

and R.POORNIMA , J .

aav

02.02.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top