SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 5459

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE
B.SARAVANAN – Appellant
Versus
The Member Secretary – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.02.2026 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.2391 of 2026 B.Saravanan S/o.Bakthavachalam, No.1/94, Mariamman Koil Street, Kannur Village, Tiruvallur Taluk and District.

Petitioner Vs

1.The Member Secretary The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, No.76, Mount Salai, Guindy, Chennai-600 032

2.The District Environmental Engineer, The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Tiruvallur.

3.The Managing Director M/s.Supreme Power Equipment Limited, No.55, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Thirumazhisai, Chennai-600 124.

Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose within time frame the petition filed by the petitioner field to revoke the order of the second respondent dated 16.04.2024 in Consent Order No.2401157846193 issued to the third respondent company.

For Petitioner: Mr.G.Mageshkumar ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

Heard.

2. Despite the order of this Court in the first round of litigation [W.P.No.42948 of 2025] that: (i) without challenge to the order passed by the authority granting consent, the petition is not maintainable; and (ii) if a challenge is to be laid to the consent to operate order issued by the Pollution Control authorities, the remedy lies before the appellate authority constituted under the laws, the petitioner has again rushed to this Court.

3. It is argued that, after the order was passed by this Court, a petition has been filed under Section 17 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

4. We find that without filing any appeal before the appellate authority constituted under law, again submission was done in form of a representation.

5. The petition is frivolous. With the liberty reserved earlier in W.P.No.42948 of 2025, dated 14.11.2025, this writ petition is dismissed with costs of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) payable to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, within a period of one month from today.

(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)

02.02.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr To:

1.The Member Secretary The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, No.76, Mount Salai, Guindy, Chennai-600 032

2.The District Environmental Engineer, The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Tiruvallur.

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.

bbr

02.02.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top