IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR
The United India Insurance Co Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Vithya – Respondent
##PAGE1##
2026:MHC:437
C.M.A.No.173 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
C.M.A.No.173 of 2026
&
C.M.P.No.2005 of 2026
The United India Insurance Co.Ltd.,
Represented by its Divisional Manager
Having Divisional Office at
TKM Complex, at Door No.46-51
3rd Floor, Katpadi Road
Vellore – 632 004 ... Appellant/2nd respondent
Versus
1. Tmt.Vithya
2. M/s.SVT Infra
No.1/150, Arcot Main Road
Puttuthaku, Walaja
Ranipet District – 632 513 ... Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles
Act,1988 against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.65 of 2021
dated 19.02.2025 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal
1/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 08:06:30 pm )
##PAGE2##C.M.A.No.173 of 2026
Subordinate Court, Vellore.
For Appellant : Ms.Harini
M/s.M.B.Gopalan Associates
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
Challenging the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
Principal Subordinate Court, Vellore dated 19.02.2025 in M.C.O.P.No.65 of
2021, the present appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company.
2. The parties are referred to by their respective ranks before the
Tribunal.
3. The following facts are necessary for disposal of this appeal:
On 10.05.2020 at about 04.30pm, the deceased, who was aged about
18 years, travelled in a lorry bearing Registration No.TN AB 3224 with his
rice to deliver it to some other place. At that time, the driver of the lorry
drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner due to which the lorry
capsized and fell into the well and the deceased drowned in water. Hence,
the parents of the deceased filed a claim petition, but subsequently second
2/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 08:06:30 pm )
##PAGE3##C.M.A.No.173 of 2026
petitioner, who is the father of the deceased, died and the mother alone
prosecuted the claim before the Tribunal.
4. The second respondent Insurance Company resisted the claim by
filing counter affidavit. It was denied by the Insurance Company that the
deceased was an agriculturist. It is the contention of the Insurance Company
that the deceased was aged about only 17 years and was a student but he
discontinued his studies even before the accident and was not earning any
income. It is the further contention of the Insurance Company that at the
time of accident, the vehicle was empty and therefore, the contention of the
claimants that the deceased travelled in the vehicle as owner of goods is
absolutely false and not based on any records. Further, the contention that
the deceased travelled in the vehicle as a coolie cum owner of goods are
contradictory statement. In the tipper lorry only three persons can travel, but
four persons including the first respondent were in the vehicle at the time of
accident and therefore, there is violation of policy conditions.
5. Based on the above pleadings following points were framed by the
Tribunal for consideration:
1) Who is responsible for the accident?
2) Whether the respondents are liable to pay compensation to
the petitioners? If so, which respondent is liable?
3/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 08:06:30 pm )
##PAGE4##C.M.A.No.173 of 2026
3) Whether the claimants are entitled for compensation, if so
what is the quantum of compensation amount?
6. Before the Tribunal, on the side of the claimants, PW1 and PW2
were examined and Exs.P1 to P16 were marked and on the side of the
respondents, RW1 and RW2 were examined and Exs.R1 and R2 were
marked. One another document was marked as Ex.X1.
7. The Tribunal, after appreciation of oral and documentary evidence,
found that the negligence is on the part of the lorry driver and awarded the
compensation of Rs.23,50,000/- and the details of which are as follows:
1. Loss of Income - Rs.22,68,000.00
2. Towards parental consortium - Rs. 44,000.00
3. Transport Expenses - Rs. 5,000.00
4. Loss of Estates
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.