IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI
P.KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THIRUPATHI – Respondent
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Order reserved on : 09.01.2026 Order pronounced on : 30.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
C.M.P.No.765 of 2024
in C.R.P.SR.No.156463 of 2023
P.Krishnan
S/o.Pachiyapa Gounder (Late) ... Petitioner
Vs.
Thirupathi
S/o.Govindhasamy ... Respondent
Prayer in C.M.P.No.765 of 2024: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed to
condone the delay of 450 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition.
Prayer in C.R.P.SR.No.156463 of 2023: Civil Revision Petition filed
underSection 115 of C.P.C. to set aside the order and decretal order in
I.A.No.138 of 2021 in O.S.No.148 of 2017, on the file of the Subordinate
Court, Palacode, dated 14.06.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Muruganantham
For Respondent : Mr.K.Ramu
for Mr.P.M.Jayachandran
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 03:53:26 pm )
##PAGE2##ORDER
The Revision Petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.148 of 2017, on
the file of the Subordinate Court, Palacode. The defendant was set exparte
and an application was filed in I.A.No.138 of 2021 for setting aside the
exparte decree, along with an application for condonation of delay of 949
days. The said application came to be dismissed, on enquiry, by the
Subordiante Court, Palacode, in and by an order dated 14.06.2022.
Challenging the said order, the present Revision Petition has been filed,
albeit with a delay of 450 days.
2.I have heard Mr.M.Muruganantham, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr.K.Ramu, for Mr.P.M.Jayachandran, counsel for the
respondent.
3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a
coolie and his home town is at Gundankootai Village, however, he is
working at Bangalore. His counsel had written to the petitioner calling upon
him to be present before the Court on 18.06.2018, however, the petitioner
did not receive the said letter, which resulted in the exparte decree being
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 03:53:26 pm )
##PAGE3##passed. The learned counsel would further state that the signature in the
alleged promissory note is denied and fair opportunity has to be given to the
petitioner / defendant to contest the Suit on merits, and so far as the delay
before this Court, the petitioner’s counsel states that the petitioner was bed
ridden and was recovering from jaundice, and therefore he was not in a
position to prefer the Revision in time. The learned counsel therefore prays
for the delay being condoned.
4.Per contra, Mr.Ramu, learned counsel for the respondent would
submit that there is absolutely no reason assigned by the petitioner for
condonation of delay of more than one year. He would also point out that
even before the trial Court, at various stages, there have been attempts to
protract the proceedings. Inviting my attention to various orders passed
before the trial Court, the learned counsel for the respondent would contend
that despite several opportunities and indulgence granted by the trial Court,
the petitioner has not availed of the same and he is bent on protracting the
proceedings, to defeat the decree granted in favour of the respondent.
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 03:53:26 pm )
##PAGE4##5.I have carefully considered the submissions advanced on either side.
I have also gone through the affidavit filed in support of the petition filed for
condonation of delay as well as the counter affidavit filed by the respondent.
6.As rightly contended by Mr.Ramu, learned counsel for the
respondent, I am unable to see sufficient cause being shown or made out in
the affidavit filed in support of the condonation of delay of 450 days, except
that the petitioner is aged about 60 years and he was affected with jaundice,
and therefore could not prefer the Revision in time.
7.Even before the trial Court, the petitioner has suffered an exparte
decree for recovery of money and the petitioner was aware of the same
despite the application filed to set aside the exparte decree, with an
application to condone the delay. The p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.