SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 5954

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Dr.Justice A.D.MARIA CLETE
M.POOJA SHREE – Appellant
Versus
ARVIND ASOKAN – Respondent



##PAGE1##

Tr.C.M.P.No.682 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

Tr.C.M.P.No.682 of 2025

M.Pooja Shree ... Petitioner

Vs

Arvind Asokan ... Respondent

PRAYER inTr.C.M.P:

This Transfer Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 C.P.C., to

withdraw the HMOP No.118 of 2025 on the file of the Family Court at Vellore and

transfer to the Family Court at Chennai.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.V.Vineeth Kumar

For Respondent : Ms.Aishwarya Sridhar

for M/s.M.C.GAN Law Firms

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 06:47:36 pm )

##PAGE2##

Tr.C.M.P.No.682 of 2025

O R D E R

Heard.

2.This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the

Code of Civil Procedure seeking withdrawal of FCOP No.118 of 2025 from the file

of the Family Court at Vellore and transfer the same to the Family Court at

Chennai.

3. The marriage between the petitioner and husband was solemnized on

11.12.2020 as per Hindu rites and customs at Mohaln Garden Kalyana Mandapam,

Chennai. The husband has filed FCOP No.118 of 2025 before the Family Court,

Vellore seeking restitution of conjugal rights

4. The petitioner is the wife. It is stated that she is residing at Chennai with

the minor child aged about three years.

5. The respondent/husband has opposed the transfer contending that if the

matter is transferred to Chennai, he would also have to travel from Vellore to

Chennai.

2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 06:47:36 pm )

##PAGE3##

Tr.C.M.P.No.682 of 2025

6. Having considered the rival submissions, this Court is of the view that in a

matrimonial proceeding, the convenience of the wife, particularly when she is

stated to be having the custody and care of a minor child of tender age, deserved

primacy. The respondent’s objection, that he would have to travel, by itself is not a

sufficient ground to deny transfer when the balance of convenience otherwise

warrants it.

7. Accordingly, Tr.C.M.P. No.682 of 2025 is allowed. FC.O.P. No.118 of

2025 on the file of the Family Court, Vellore, is withdrawn and transferred to the

file of the Family Court, Chennai. The Family Court, Vellore, shall transmit the

entire records to the Family Court, Chennai, within three (3) weeks from the date

of receipt of this order and the Family Court, Chennai shall dispose of the matter

in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, uninfluenced by any

observations made in this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

29.01.2026

mfa

Index: Yes / No

Speaking Order / Non-speaking Order

Neutral Citation: Yes / No

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 06:47:36 pm )

##PAGE4##

Tr.C.M.P.No.682 of 2025

To

1. Family Court at Vellore

2. Family Court at Chennai.

4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 06:47:36 pm )

##PAGE5##

Tr.C.M.P.No.682 of 2025

DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J

mfa

Tr.C.M.P.No.682 of 2025

29.01.2026

5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 06:47:36 pm )

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top