IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Kalaichelvi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
##PAGE1##
2026:MHC:433
WA No. 2801 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29-01-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
WA No. 2801 of 2023
Kalaichelvi
..Appellant(s)
Vs
1. The District Collector
Erode District.
2. The District Revenue Officer
Erode District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Erode.
4. The Thasildhar
Erode Taluk, Erode District.
5. The Block Development Officer
Modakurichi, Panchayat Union, Erode.
6. Punchai Kala Mangalam Panchayat
Rep by its President, Modakurichi, Panchayat
Union, Erode.
..Respondent(s)
__________
Page1 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 06:19:54 pm )
##PAGE2##WA No. 2801 of 2023
To set aside the order dated 23-02-2022 made in
WP.No.28527/2012 and allow the Writ Appeal and thus render justice.
For Appellant(s): Mr.V.K.Kavin For Mr.M.Premkumar
For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun Kumar,
Additional Government Pleader For Rr1 To 4.
Mr.D.Gopal
Government Advocate For R5
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Under assail is the writ order dated 23.02.2022 in WP.No.28527 of 2012.
2. Writ petitioner is the appellant before this Court.
3. Uncontroverted facts between the parties would show that husband of the
appellant was an ex-service man and died on 23.09.1995. Petitioner applied for
assignment of Tharisu Land in S.No.531/9 of Punjai Kala Mangalam Village, Erode
Taluk. Land measuring 1.18 acres was assigned in favour of appellant on 25.05.2005
by the Revenue Department. Admittedly, appellant left the Village by stating that she
went for taking medical treatment. For about six years, she was not in the village, nor
the assigned land was under cultivation. During the said period, Village Panchayat
passed a resolution by majority and used the assigned land for digging a pond to cater
the needs of the people residing in the village. There was no objection from the
appellant assignee for about 6 years. In the year 2011, appellant submitted a
representation stating that assigned land was converted as a pond. Therefore, made a
request to assign an alternate land. Tahsildar, Erode given a reply stating that the
__________
Page2 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 06:19:54 pm )
##PAGE3##WA No. 2801 of 2023
assigned land was not cultivated by the appellant for many years and the villagers
under Anna Marumalarchi Scheme dug a pond in the said land for the benefit of the
people of that village. Further, Tahsildar, Erode stated that there is no Government
land available for assignment. The said reply dated 27.05.2011 came to be challenged
in the writ petition.
3. Appellant would mainly contend that assignment order was not cancelled by
following the procedures as contemplated. That apart, assigned land was wrongfully
utilised for digging up a pond by panchayat. Therefore, she is entitled for an alternate
assignment as per her request.
4. Learned Additional Government Pleader would oppose by stating that, it is an
assignment granted on condition that the assignee should cultivate the land.
Admittedly, appellant left the village and residing away from the village. After a lapse
of six years, an application was filed seeking alternate land. When the assigned land
was not cultivated and conditions of assignment are violated, appellant has no right to
claim alternate land. He would further submit that not passing any cancellation order
would not confer any right on the appellant to claim an alternate assignment.
5.This Court has considered the arguments as advanced between the parties to the
lis on hand.
6. No doubt, assignment granted must be cancelled by following the procedures
contemplated under the Revenue Standing Orders. In the present case, no such
__________
Page3 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 06:19:54 pm )
##PAGE4##WA No. 2801 of 2023
cancellation order has been passed. Thus, Revenue Authorities have committed a
mistake. However, land was not taken over by the Revenue authority, but the
Panchayat Unio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.