IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice C. SARAVANAN
MOHANAN GNANSEKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE TAX OFFICER – Respondent
##PAGE1##
W.P.No.28321 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.01.2026
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.No.28321 of 2023
and
W.M.P.Nos.27842 and 27843 of 2023
Mr.Mohanan Gnansekar
Proprietor of M/s.Hind Aluminium Company,
SF No.554/3D2, Begapalli Village,
Nallur Panchayat, Hosur Taluk
Krishnagiri District,
Hosur-635 121. ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The State Tax Officer,
Hosur (North-1) Assessment Circle,
Office of the Assistant Commissioner,
Hosur North, I Assessment Circle,
Integrated Commercial Taxes Building
Second Floor,
Hosur – 635 109.
2. The Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Ezhilgam, Chepauk
Chennai-600 005. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for
issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the impugned
proceedings of the first respondent in GSTIN:33AMKPG7664E1Z1/2017-18
dated 29.08.2023 and the consequential orders passed under section 74 in
Reference No.ZD3308231649732 dated 29.08.2023 and the “ Summary of
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 03:53:25 pm )
##PAGE2##W.P.No.28321 of 2023
the Order” passed in Form GST DRC-07 dated 29.08.2023 issued in
Reference No.ZD3308231649732 and quash all the impugned proceedings as
passed contrary to the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 and TNGST Act,
2017 and also passed in violation of the principles of natural justice and
further direct the first respondent or any other Officer assigned by the second
respondent to consider the objections dated 17.08.2023 and the documents
filed by the petitioner in a fair and judious manner and pass a fresh
assessment order in accordance with law after granting reasonable
opportunity to the petitioner including cross examination and personal
hearing to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajkumar
For Respondents : Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran,
Government Advocate
***************
O R D E R
This is the second round of litigation before this Court.
2. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order
dated 29.08.2023 issued in Form GST DRC-07 passed for the tax period
2017-2018, by which the proposal in the Show Cause Notice dated
02.08.2023 in DRC-01 has been confirmed against the petitioner.
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 03:53:25 pm )
##PAGE3##W.P.No.28321 of 2023
3. The impugned order was preceded with a reminder dated
02.08.2023 and an intimation dated 17.08.2023 issued by the office of the
respondent, wherein a specific timeline was prescribed for filing a reply to
the Show Cause Notice and personal hearing.
4. The timeline fixed in the aforesaid intimation dated 17.08.2023
is as below:-
Sr. Description Particulars
No.
1. Date by which reply has to be submitted 24/08/2023
2. Date of Personal Hearing 17/08/2023
3. Time of Personal Hearing 16:07
4. Venue where Personal Hearing will be held Office of the Asst
Commissioner (ST) Hosur.
5. On a reading of the timeline mentioned in the aforesaid Notice
dated 17.08.2023, it is clear that there is a gross violation of the Principles of
Natural Justice. It is unexplicable as to how the date fixed for submission of
reply to the Show Cause Notice is subsequent to the date filed for personal
hearing on 17.08.2023 which is also fixed on the same day of issuance of
such reminder notice.
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 03:53:25 pm )
##PAGE4##W.P.No.28321 of 2023
6. The entire procedure adopted by the Respondent in passing the
assessment order is irregular and warrants interference by this Court.
7. Considering the same, the impugned order is quashed and the
case is remitted back to the respondents to pass a fresh order on merits after
affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
8. The respondent shall fix a personal hearing, on which date the
petitioner shall appear before the respondent and thereafter the respondent
shall proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits as expeditiously as
possible, preferably within a period of three months from the dat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.