IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
The Chairman and Managing Director – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY – Respondent
##PAGE1##
2026:MHC:438
W.P.No.39721 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.01.2026
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.39721 of 2025
and W.M.P.No.44633 of 2025
1. The Chairman & Managing Director,
M/s.Bharat Electronics Limited,
Outer Ring Road, Nagavara,
Bengaluru – 560 045.
2. The General Manager – HR,
M/s.Bharat Electronics Limited,
Outer Ring Road, Nagavara,
Bengaluru – 560 045.
3. The General Manager,
M/s.Bharat Electronics Limited,
Nandambakkam,
Chennai – 600 089.
Represented by General Manager .. Petitioners
Versus
1. The Secretary,
BEL – TEX Employees Union,
M/s.Bharat Electronics Limited,
Nandambakkam,
Chennai – 600 089.
2. L.Singaravelu,
Junior Section Officer (Dismissed Employee),
Employee No.209556,
Plot No.26, 19th Cross Street,
1/11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 08:06:31 pm )
##PAGE2##W.P.No.39721 of 2025
Padmavathy Nagar Extension,
Madambakkam, Chennai – 600 126.
Ph.No.9677004194 .. Respondents
(Second respondent is impleaded as per the order in
W.M.P.No.54459 of 2025 in W.P.No.39721 of 2025,
dated 29.01.2026)
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
seeking a Writ of Certiorarifed Mandamus calling for the records of the
Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chennai in
Misc. Application No.1/2024 in I.D.No.30/2022, dated 24.04.2024 and
Interlocutory Application No.1/2025 in Miscellaneous Application No.1 of
2024 in I.D.No.30 of 2022, dated 12.09.2025 and quash the same and
further direct the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Chennai to restore the Approval Application.
For Petitioner : Mr.Haroon Al Rasheed,
for M/s.Advit Law Chambers
For Respondents : Mr.L.Singaravelu,
Party-in-person
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order, dated
24.04.2024 made in Miscellaneous Application No.1 of 2024 in I.D.No.30
of 2022 and Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2025 in Miscellaneous
Application No.1 of 2024 in I.D.No.30 of 2022, dated 12.09.2025 and to
quash the same.
2/11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 08:06:31 pm )
##PAGE3##W.P.No.39721 of 2025
2. Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner and
perusing the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition and the material
records of the case, the grievance of the petitioner is that it is a public
sector undertaking functioning under the control of the Central
Government. The workman, L.Singaravelu, being the employee under the
petitioner management, during the COVID phase – II, went into public
making unscrupulous and scurrilous allegations against the management as
if the management is risking the lives of the workmen. Therefore,
disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the said L.Singaravelu and
by the order, dated 29.08.2023, dismissed the workman from service.
Since, already, an Industrial Dispute was pending, the application in
M.A.No.1 of 2024, was filed for approval of the punishment under Section
33(a)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. When the same came up for
hearing on 24.04.2024, the Incharge Officer, who was manning the
Tribunal on a temporary basis having been deputed from some other
bench, without understanding the circumstances under which the Approval
Petition is filed, erroneously questioned that when the petitioner
management has already dismissed the employee from the service, why it
is filing the Approval Petition and the party-in-person was also appearing
3/11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/02/2026 08:06:31 pm )
##PAGE4##W.P.No.39721 of 2025
and they also further submitted as if it is not necessary at all and that if
they are aggrieved, they will file the Industrial Dispute.
3. In view of the said outburst by the Tribunal, since the Counsel
who is representing the management namely, Mr.Narayanan, was an
elderly gentleman, aged about 81 years, tried to make his point to the
Tribunal, but, the Tribunal repeatedly threatened either to withdraw the
Computation Petition or that it will dismiss it by mulcting
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.