IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI
K.SAKTHIVEL – Appellant
Versus
T.R.GURUVENKATACHALAM – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRP No. 5206 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28-01-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP No. 5206 of 2025
K.Sakthivel
Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. T.R.Guruvenkatachalam
2.P.Pon Nandhagopal
Respondent(s)
PRAYER
To set aside the order and decreetal order dated 01.09.2025 in IA No. 1 of 2025
in IA No. 189 of 2015 in OS No. 22 of 2015 on the file of I Additional District
Court, Erode by allowing this Revision.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy
For Respondent(s): Mr.T.S.Baskaran, for R1
ORDER
Heard Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy, learned counsel appearing for the revision
petitioner/third party and Mr.T.S.Baskaran, learned counsel for the first
respondent/decree holder.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:26:32 pm )
##PAGE2##CRP No. 5206 of 2025
2. Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner states
that the petitioner as a third party moved an interim application in IA.No.1 of
2025 to raise the order of attachment passed in I.A.No.189 of 2015, by order
dated, 23.09.2025. The learned counsel pointing out to the decree being one for
recovery of money filed by the first respondent/decree holder/plaintiff as against
the second respondent judgment debtor/defendant, brings to my notice the order
of attachment, which came to be passed on 23.09.2015. The suit was decreed
exparte on the same date on which the order of attachment came to be passed.
The petitioner contending that he has purchased the property, which was
attached on 23.09.2015, even earlier, namely, on 02.03.2015, in and by a
registered sale deed, has moved the Trial Court for raising the order of
attachment. However, the Trial Court has erroneously found that unless the
money decree is satisfied, the petitioner, though being a purchaser would not be
entitled to raise the order of attachment. The learned counsel therefore, prays for
revision being allowed.
3. Per contra, Mr.T.S.Baskaran, learned counsel appearing for the first
respondent/decree holder, would contend that the Trial Court has not passed any
erroneous order. According to the learned counsel, the finding of the Trial Court
was that pending application for attachment before the judgment alone, the
petitioner had purchased the property and therefore, he cannot plead ignorance
or claim that he is a bonafide purchaser without notice.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:26:32 pm )
##PAGE3##CRP No. 5206 of 2025
4. I have carefully considered the submissions advanced by the learned
counsel for the parties. Admittedly, no interest in the immovable property was
subject matter of the suit, which was filed by the first respondent, as plaintiff, as
against the second respondent/defendant. It was a simpliciter suit for recovery
of money and along with the suit, the first respondent had filed an application
under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking attachment of the
immovable property, which originally belonged to the second
respondent/defendant. On the date of the suit being decreed exparte, the
application for attachment before judgment was also favourably considered and
ordered in favour of the first respondent.
5. However, the petitioner being a stranger to the lis, came forward with
I.A.No.1 of 2025, invoking Order 38 Rule 9 CPC for raising the order of
attachment, contending that his purchase was prior to the order of attachment
being passed by the Trial Court. The Trial Court, without noticing the same, has
erroneously proceeded to hold that it is the duty of the third party to satisfy the
decree, before he becomes entitled to an order of raising the attachment. Once
the petitioner is able to demonstrate that, on the date of his purchase, that too,
by way of a registered instrument, there was no attachment of the immovable
property concerned, then the petitioner was certainly entitled to protection and
the application under Order 38 Rule 9 CPC ought to have been allowed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:26:32 pm )
##PAGE4##CRP
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.