IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
Paramasivam – Appellant
Versus
P.Marimuthu – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRP No. 76 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28-01-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR
CRP No. 76 of 2026
1. Paramasivam, S/o. Arunachala Devar,
No.9/5, 1st Avenue, Sundar Nagar,
Ekkatuthangal.
2. P.Ramalakshmi, W/o.Paramasivam,
Rest.at 9/5, 1st Avenue,
Sundar Nagar, Ekkattuthangal.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. P.Marimuthu, S/o. Pool Thevar,
No.54, 2nd Avenue, Defence Officers Colony,
Ekkattuthangal, Chennai-600 097.
2. M.Mariammal, W/o.P.Marimuthu,
No.54, 2nd Avenue, Defence Officers Colony,
Ekkattuthangal, Chennai-600 097.
..Respondent(s)
__________
Page1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:22:17 pm )
##PAGE2##CRP No. 76 of 2026
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India
to issue appropriate direction for expeditious disposal of the final decree
application numbered as IA No.438 of 2018 in OS.No.33 of 2008 pending on
the file of the Additional District Judge, Chengalpet by allowing the present
CRP.
For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Sai Shankar
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Trial Court
to dispose of the final decree application filed by the petitioners in I.A.No.438
of 2018 in O.S.No33 of 2008 pending on the file of Additional District Judge,
Chengalpattu in expeditious manner.
2. It is not in dispute that the petitioners herein/plaintiffs filed the above
said suit in O.S.No.33 of 2008 seeking partition and in that suit, preliminary
decree for partition of petitioners' half share was passed on 16.02.2018.
Pursuant to the said preliminary decree, the petitioners filed I.A.No.438 of 2018
seeking to pass final decree.
3. It seen from the e-courts status filed in the typed set of papers that
Advocate Commissioner, appointed by court, had filed his report on 22 01.2024
expressing difficulty in executing warrant. Subsequently, the final decree
proceedings were adjourned from time to time for the purpose of filing
objections by the respondents. When the matter was adjourned for enquiry in
__________
Page2 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:22:17 pm )
##PAGE3##CRP No. 76 of 2026
the final decree application, the respondents appeared to have represented
before the Trial Court on 24.02.2025, regarding SLP to be filed by them,
challenging the judgment and decree passed in the first appeal. Based on the
memo filed by the respondents, it appears that the matter has been adjourned for
more than ten months. The e-courts status dated 21.01.2026 reads as follows:
“ I.A.No.438 of 2018 : Production of SLP particulars and
stay particulars - call on 16.02.2026.”
Therefore, it is clear that the respondents have been taken time before the Trial
Court under the guise of filing SLP and till date, it appears that the respondents
have not produced any stay order passed by the Apex Court. If there is no stay
order passed by the superior courts, there may not be any impediment for the
Trial Court to proceed with the enquiry in the final decree proceedings. The
suit was of the year 2008 and I.A.No.438/2018 seeking final decree was filed as
early as in the year 2018. The report of the Advocate Commissioner was filed
as early as on 22.01.2024. In such circumstances, absolutely, there is no
impediment for the trial court to proceed with the enquiry for passing final
decree, unless the respondents are able to file any stay order passed by the
superior court.
__________
Page3 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:22:17 pm )
##PAGE4##CRP No. 76 of 2026
4. In the light of the said facts, this court is inclined to direct the learned
Additional District Judge, Chengalpattu to dispose of I.A.No.438 of 2018 in
O.S.No.33 of 2008, filed for passing final decree, as expeditiously as possible.
I would like to state that the direction issued by this court for expeditious
disposal of the final decree petition will not operate, in case, the respondents are
able to produce the stay order from the Apex Court.
28-01-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.