SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 6092

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
Paramasivam – Appellant
Versus
P.Marimuthu – Respondent



##PAGE1##

CRP No. 76 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-01-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

CRP No. 76 of 2026

1. Paramasivam, S/o. Arunachala Devar,

No.9/5, 1st Avenue, Sundar Nagar,

Ekkatuthangal.

2. P.Ramalakshmi, W/o.Paramasivam,

Rest.at 9/5, 1st Avenue,

Sundar Nagar, Ekkattuthangal.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. P.Marimuthu, S/o. Pool Thevar,

No.54, 2nd Avenue, Defence Officers Colony,

Ekkattuthangal, Chennai-600 097.

2. M.Mariammal, W/o.P.Marimuthu,

No.54, 2nd Avenue, Defence Officers Colony,

Ekkattuthangal, Chennai-600 097.

..Respondent(s)

__________

Page1 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:22:17 pm )

##PAGE2##

CRP No. 76 of 2026

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India

to issue appropriate direction for expeditious disposal of the final decree

application numbered as IA No.438 of 2018 in OS.No.33 of 2008 pending on

the file of the Additional District Judge, Chengalpet by allowing the present

CRP.

For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Sai Shankar

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Trial Court

to dispose of the final decree application filed by the petitioners in I.A.No.438

of 2018 in O.S.No33 of 2008 pending on the file of Additional District Judge,

Chengalpattu in expeditious manner.

2. It is not in dispute that the petitioners herein/plaintiffs filed the above

said suit in O.S.No.33 of 2008 seeking partition and in that suit, preliminary

decree for partition of petitioners' half share was passed on 16.02.2018.

Pursuant to the said preliminary decree, the petitioners filed I.A.No.438 of 2018

seeking to pass final decree.

3. It seen from the e-courts status filed in the typed set of papers that

Advocate Commissioner, appointed by court, had filed his report on 22 01.2024

expressing difficulty in executing warrant. Subsequently, the final decree

proceedings were adjourned from time to time for the purpose of filing

objections by the respondents. When the matter was adjourned for enquiry in

__________

Page2 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:22:17 pm )

##PAGE3##

CRP No. 76 of 2026

the final decree application, the respondents appeared to have represented

before the Trial Court on 24.02.2025, regarding SLP to be filed by them,

challenging the judgment and decree passed in the first appeal. Based on the

memo filed by the respondents, it appears that the matter has been adjourned for

more than ten months. The e-courts status dated 21.01.2026 reads as follows:

“ I.A.No.438 of 2018 : Production of SLP particulars and

stay particulars - call on 16.02.2026.”

Therefore, it is clear that the respondents have been taken time before the Trial

Court under the guise of filing SLP and till date, it appears that the respondents

have not produced any stay order passed by the Apex Court. If there is no stay

order passed by the superior courts, there may not be any impediment for the

Trial Court to proceed with the enquiry in the final decree proceedings. The

suit was of the year 2008 and I.A.No.438/2018 seeking final decree was filed as

early as in the year 2018. The report of the Advocate Commissioner was filed

as early as on 22.01.2024. In such circumstances, absolutely, there is no

impediment for the trial court to proceed with the enquiry for passing final

decree, unless the respondents are able to file any stay order passed by the

superior court.

__________

Page3 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:22:17 pm )

##PAGE4##

CRP No. 76 of 2026

4. In the light of the said facts, this court is inclined to direct the learned

Additional District Judge, Chengalpattu to dispose of I.A.No.438 of 2018 in

O.S.No.33 of 2008, filed for passing final decree, as expeditiously as possible.

I would like to state that the direction issued by this court for expeditious

disposal of the final decree petition will not operate, in case, the respondents are

able to produce the stay order from the Apex Court.

28-01-2026

Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top