IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Renuga Devi.R – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Educational Officer – Respondent
##PAGE1##
WP(MD).No.22265 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
WP(MD) No. 22265 of 2022
and WMP(MD).Nos.16441 & 16443 of 2022
R.Renuga Devi ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The Chief Educational Officer
Chief Educational Office
Dindigul
Dindigul District
2.The District Educational Officer
District Educational Office
Palani
Dindigul District
3.The District Elementary Educational Officer
District Elementary Educational Office
Dindigul, Dindigul District
4.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer
Assistant Elementary Educational Office
Ottanchathiram
Dindigul District
5.Thangaraj ....Respondents
Prayer:Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the
records relating to the proceedings made in Na.Ka.No.3922/A2/2022 dated
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:17:29 pm )
##PAGE2##WP(MD).No.22265 of 2022
18.08.2022 on the file of the second respondent, quash the same, and further
direct 1 and 2 respondents herein to grant school committee approval of
petitioner's school namely Hindu Aided Middle School, Kodengipatti Village,
Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District on the basis of order made in
WP(MD).No.2597 of 2012 on the file of this Court dated 02.04.2012 within a
stipulated period as may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner :Mr.R.Sundar
For Respondents :Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam
Government Advocate for R1 to R4
:Mr.S.Karthik for R5
O R D E R
The present writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the order
passed by the second respondent herein on 18.08.2022 wherein an order of
direct payment has been imposed on the petitioner School primarily on the
ground that the School Committee has not reconstituted.
2.In the year 2012, there was a dispute among the educational agency
and due to the said dispute, direct payment order was passed. Later, the
dispute among the educational agency was resolved and the direct payment
was set aside by this Court in WP(MD).No.4719 of 2012 dated 07.02.2019.
3.Due to the dispute in the educational agency and the order of direct
payment, the School Committee was not revived after the orders of the writ
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:17:29 pm )
##PAGE3##WP(MD).No.22265 of 2022
Court. The petitioner has sent a representation to the authorities on
25.06.2022 requesting them to approve the School Committee that was
prevailing in the year 2007. Without acceding to the said request, the present
impugned order has been passed imposing direct payment for the second
time. This order is under challenge in the present writ petition.
4.According to the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, a
representation has been addressed to the authorities on 25.06.2022 to revive
and approve the School Committee that was prevailing in the year 2011.
5.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the official
respondents submits that the School Committee would be valid only for a
period of three years. That apart, the members of the School Committee are
likely to get extension, depending upon the facts and circumstances of the
case. Therefore, unless a fresh proposal is forwarded by the educational
agency, approval for the School Committee cannot be granted.
6.I have considered the submissions made on either side and perused
the material records.
7.As rightly pointed out by the learned Government Advocate, the
proposal for the new School Committee has to be forwarded by the writ
petitioner to the concerned authorities indicating the members of the present
School Committee. Only then the authority would be in a position to take a
decision. The question of reviving the School Committee that was prevailing
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/02/2026 01:17:29 pm )
##PAGE4##WP(MD).No.22265 of 2022
in the year 2011 does not arise.
8.In view of the above said facts, the petitioner educational agency is
directed to convene a meeting and forward the propo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.