IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
RUBALA – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.01.2026 Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN H.C.P.No.125 of 2026 Rubala ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore-18.
2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Pothanur, Coimbatore-641 023.
3. S.Arunkarthikeyan S/o.Srinivasan ... Respondents Prayer: This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the petitioner’s minor son named A.Dwargan, aged 9 years and the petitioner’s minor daughter named A.Tanvi, aged about 6 years, before this Court from the custody of the third respondent and handover them to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.R. Krishnasamy For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor Assisted by Mr.M.Karthikeyan for RR1 & 2 *******
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.)
This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the petitioner’s minor children A.Dwargan, aged 9 years and A.Tanvi, aged about 6 years and to handover their custody to the petitioner.
2 The petitioner is mother of the detenues viz. A.Dwargan, aged 9 years and A.Tanvi, aged about 6 years. The third respondent is none other than the father of the detenues.
3 It appears that the dispute between the parties is family dispute and custody of the minor children. The petitioner, being mother and the third respondent being father of the detenues, both are natural guardian and the detenues are in the custody of the third respondent, who is also one of the natural guardians and hence there is no illegal custody.
4 In the cases of custody of the children, the interest and welfare of the children must always be the Court's paramount consideration, which needs evidence and the same cannot be decided by the Writ Court. Further the petitioner has got efficacious remedy before the competent Court.
5 In view of the above reasons, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed.
[PVJ] [MJRJ]
23.01.2026 cgi To
1. The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore-18.
2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Pothanur, Coimbatore-641 023.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
P.VELMURUGAN. J.
and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
cgi
23.01.2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.