SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 6628

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
M.Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.01.2026 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN C.M.P.(MD) No.207 of 2026 in W.A.(MD) SR No.1349 of 2026 and W.A.(MD) SR No.1349 of 2026 M.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner -vs-

1.The District Collector Trichy District, Trichy

2.The Commissioner Pullambadi Panchayat Union Pullambadi and Post Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Lalgudi Revenue Divisional Office Lalgudi, Lalgudi Taluk Trichy District

4.The Special Officer Punjai Sangenthi Village Pullambadi Panchayat Union Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District

5.T.Subramanian ... Respondents PRAYER (in C.M.P.(MD) No.207 of 2026): Petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to grant leave to the petitioner to file a writ appeal as against the order passed by this Court, dated 15.10.2025 in W.P.(MD) No.

25840 of 2025.

PRAYER (in W.A.(MD) SR No.1349 of 2026): Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order passed by this Court, dated

15.10.2025 in W.P.(MD) No.25840 of 2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Santha Kumar For Respondents : Mr.D.Sasi Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]

This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to prefer a third party appeal as against the order dated 15.10.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(MD) No.25840 of 2025. 2. The petitioner / proposed appellant claims that he has right in Survey No.674/18 for which there is also a civil suit filed by his mother and the same is pending disposal. Hence, the petitioner seeks leave to prefer a third party appeal as against the order passed by the learned Single Judge.

3. On perusal of the order passed by the learned Single Judge, this Court finds that the order of the learned Single Judge does not confer any title to the writ petitioner. Only a direction has been issued to the Panchayat Commissioner to collect the property tax and issue property tax receipt to the writ petitioner, with a rider that the said arrangement is subject to the outcome of the civil suit. Hence, we are of the view that a third party appeal is not necessary against the order passed by the learned Single Judge and if at all the petitioner herein has any right over the subject property, he has to work out his remedy in the pending civil suit in accordance with law.

4. Accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition seeking leave of this Court to the petitioner herein to prefer a writ appeal as third party stands dismissed. Consequently, W.A.(MD) SR No.1349 of 2026 stands rejected.

[G.J., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.]

22.01.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk To:

1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Commissioner, Pullambadi Panchayat Union, Pullambadi and Post, Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi Revenue Divisional Office, Lalgudi, Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District.

4.The Special Officer, Punjai Sangenthi Village, Pullambadi Panchayat Union, Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District.

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

krk in W.A.(MD) SR No.1349 of 2026 and W.A.(MD) SR No.1349 of 2026

22.01.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top