SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 6716

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Kanimozhi pannerselvam college of Education – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.01.2026 CORAM :

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.Nos.26766, 29712 and 29713 of 2022 Kanimozhi Pannerselvam College of Education, Represented by its Correspondent V.Kavitha .. Petitioner (in both the cases)

Versus

1. The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University, Gangaiamman Koil Street, Karapakkam, Chennai – 600 097.

2. The Syndicate of University, Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University, Gangaiamman Koil Street, Karapakkam, Chennai – 600 097. .. Respondents (in both the cases)

Prayer in W.P.No.27530 of 2022 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the first respondent in proceedings No.TNTEU/R/Affln/Show Cause Notice/2022/03993, dated 26.09.2022 and quash the same.

Prayer in W.P.No.30280 of 2022 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent in proceedings in No.TNTEU/R/Affln/Withdrawal/2022/04209, dated 29.10.2022 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.L.Murali Krishnan (in both the cases)

For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander, (in both the cases) Standing Counsel

COMMON ORDER

These two Writ Petitions are connected to each other and as such, are taken up and disposed of by this common order.

2. W.P.No.27530 of 2022 is filed with a prayer to call for the records on the file of the first respondent relating to the show-cause notice, dated 26.09.2022 and to quash the same. W.P.No.30280 of 2022 is filed with a prayer to call for the records relating to the order, dated 29.10.2022 withdrawing the recognition and to quash the same.

3. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, an interim order is also granted in favour of the petitioner institution and as on date, the petitioner institution is functioning on the strength of the interim order. The entire exercise that was done and the interim order that was passed and the manner in which the final order was passed has been encapsulated by this Court in W.P.No.30280 of 2022 speaking through the Hon’ble Mr.Justice R.Suresh Kumar by the order, dated 15.11.2022 and the same is extracted hereunder for ready reference:-

“This Court, by an interim order dated

14.10.2022 in W.P.No.25730 of 2022, has passed the following order:

“ Considering the facts and circumstances and after having heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides, this Court is inclined to grant the following interim order:

That there shall be a direction to the respondent University to furnish the inspection report dated 24.06.2022 pertaining to the petitioner college to the petitioner college within a period of one week. On receipt of the same, the petitioner college shall give reply with supportive documents within a period of one week thereafter, based on the reply to be submitted by the petitioner college, the University can discuss and deliberate and decide the issue at the appropriate forum of the University and come to a conclusion that, if action is required such decision can be reduced into writing in the form of a statement and shall be filed before this Court in a sealed cover. Post the matter on 07.11.2022.”

2. Pursuant to the same, the inspection report has been sent by the respondent University in a cover dated 21.10.2022 which was dispatched on 22.10.2022 and the petitioner received it on 27.10.2022.

3. Before the petitioner could send the reply within a period of one week, as referred in the order cited above, the respondent University has passed an order on

29.10.2022 by stating the following:

“Based on the above direction, the University, has forwarded the Surprise Inspection Report vide Office th Communication reference 11 cited.

However, the University is yet to receive any explanation / communication from Kanimozhi Panneerselvam College of Education, Nagapattinam District for communication th

11 cited.

In accordance with decision taken by Sy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top