Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
K.M.KABIR CT/GD NO.914521346 – Appellant
Versus
THE SENIOR COMMANDANT – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR K.M.Kabir, CT/GD No.914521346, CISF Unit, VSP, Visakapattinam, Andra Pradesh.
..Petitioner Vs
1. The Senior Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, 8th Reserve Battalion, Kishtwar, Jammu and Kashmir.
2. The Deputy Inspector General, Cisf North Zone, Head Quarters, Saket, New Delhi.
3. The Deputy Inspector General, Cisf Unit, NLC, Neyvlei, Cuddalore District.
4. The Inspector General, North Sector, CISF Campus, Saket, Malviya Nagar Post, New Delhi 110 017.
5. The Union of India, Rep. By Its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi.
..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order
Disciplinary actions must adhere to established procedures, and courts will not interfere unless the punishment is shockingly disproportionate or the process violated natural justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cause of action must arise within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court for the exercise of power under Article 226 of the Consti....
Territorial jurisdiction of the court is determined based on the material, essential, or integral part of the cause of action, and consent cannot confer jurisdiction upon the court.
A High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226(2) requires that part of the cause of action arises within its territorial limits.
The entire cause of action must arise within the court's jurisdiction for it to entertain a petition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article