SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 7399

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
R.SELVAM – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Panchayats / District Collector – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.01.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P. No. 1022 of 2026 and W.M.P. Nos. 1201 and 1203 of 2026 R.Selvam …Petitioner Vs.

1.The Inspector of Panchayats/

District Collector Villupuram, Villupuram District.

2.The Assistant Director (Village Panchayat)

O/o.DRDA Office, Villupuram District.

3.Tmt.S.Rajeswari

4.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to the Government Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. ...Respondents Prayer : This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, calling for the records relating to impugned order in Na.Ka. No.A3/2192/ 2025 dated 22.12.2025 passed by the 1st respondent and the consequential gazette notification publication in No.VI(2) / 37(a) / 2025 dated 24.12.2025 by the 1st respondent herein and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and unlawful For Petitioner(s): Mr.Sudarshan for M/s.T.Sundaravadanam For Respondent(s): Ms.C.Meera Arumugham, Additional Government Pleader (for R1, R2 & R4)

ORDER

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary to the Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai –

600 009 is suo motu impleaded as the 4th respondent to this writ petition.

2.Heard Mr.Sudarshan for Mr.T.Sundaravatanam and Ms.C.Meera Arumugam for R1, R2 and newly impleaded R4.

3.The petitioner was elected as the President of Panchamadevi Village Panchayat in the year 2021. By virtue of the impugned proceedings, the 1st respondent has removed him from the said post. Challenging the same, the writ petition is before this Court.

4.When the matter came up for admission, I pointed out to Mr.Sudarshan that under Section 219 of the Panchayats Act, the petitioner has remedy of Revision before the 4th respondent. In response, he submits that the petitioner has in fact availed the said remedy on 06.01.2026 and as it had not been considered, he is before this Court.

5.Ms.C.Meera Arumugam states that the appeal will be disposed of within a period of three (3) weeks from today (19.1.2026). Her statement is recorded.

6.The 4th respondent is directed to dispose the Statutory Revision preferred under Section 219 of the Panchayats Act within a period of three (3)

weeks.

7.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions are closed.

8.Call the matter on 13.02.2026 for compliance.

9.Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment.

19-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MAYA To

1.The Inspector of Panchayats/

District Collector Villupuram, Villupuram District.

2.The Assistant Director (Village Panchayat)

O/o.DRDA Office, Villupuram District.

3.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

MAYA

19-01-2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top