Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SENTHILKUMAR
State Bank of India, represented by its Chief Manager – Appellant
Versus
Aruna Textiles and Exports Limited, represented by Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. liquidation of aruna textiles and operational details. (Para 1 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. claims established for doubled worker's shares. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. recovery claims detailed from employees' provident fund. (Para 18 , 19 , 22) |
| 4. arguments presented by various counsels. (Para 20 , 21 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. ruling on rightful claims and fund distributions. (Para 58 , 60 , 61) |
ORDER :
Comp.A.No.750 of 2015 has been filed by the State Bank of India, to direct the Official Liquidator to release the sum of Rs.7.20 crores to the applicant bank representing the respective share in respect of the sale of the mortgaged property namely land and factory building together with plant and machinery situate at N.Paraipatti Kulathur Village, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District, comprised in S.No.966, 967 and 971 admeasuring an extent of 8.30 acres forthwith.
3.Comp.A.No.509 of 2017 has been filed by National Textile Worker's Union, to direct the Official Liquidator to entertain and declare the dividend due to the workers of M/s.Selvamani Doubling Unit (ie., Joint Unit of M/s.Aruna Textiles and Exports Limited) from and out of the funds of the said M/s.Aruna Textiles and Exports Limited, the
The official liquidator must adjudicate and prioritize claims from workers and creditors according to statutory provisions, ensuring that dues to workers are paramount over other claims, aligning wit....
The court underscored the statutory priority of provident fund dues in insolvency, affirming the need for Liquidators to adhere strictly to the provisions of the IBC and EPF Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 7B of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the principles regarding the clubbing o....
An employee of a wholly owned subsidiary is entitled to provident fund benefits from the date of appointment, despite the subsidiary's later voluntary coverage under the EPF Act.
Provident fund dues do not have priority over other debts during liquidation under IBC; they are subject to waterfall mechanism provisions.
EPFO dues are excluded from liquidation assets and prioritized for payment over other claims in corporate insolvency proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
