SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 8040

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Chitrakala.V – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and WMP(MD) No.3886 of 2023 V.Chitrakala .....Petitioner Vs

1. The Secretary to Government Department of School Education Fort St. George Chennai 9.

2. The Director Directorate of School Education DPI Compound College Road Chennai 6.

3. The Director Directorate of Matriculation Education DPI Compound College Road Chennai 6.

4. The Chief Educational Officer Trichirappalli Trichirappalli District.

5. The District Educational Officer Lalgudi, Trichy District.

6. The District Educational Officer (Private Matriculation)

Thennur, Trichy District.

7. Sri Balavidya Mandir Matriculation Higher Secondary School Represented by its Correspondent Paluvoor, Samayapuram Main Road Trichy District. 8.M.Ravindran Correspondent Sri Balavidhya Mandir Matriculation Higher Secondary School Paluvoor Samayapuram Main Road Trichy District. 9. Kalaiarasan Principal Sri Balavidhya Mandir Matriculation Higher Secondary School Paluvoor Samayapuram Main Road Trichy District. ....Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 6 to take appropriate action against the 7th respondent school by considering the representation dated 6.2.2023 and consequently, allow the petitioners son to continue the IX Standard in the 7th respondent school for the academic year 2022-2023 For Petitioner :Mr.S.Sankar For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R6 : Mr.T.S.R.Venkatramana Senior Advocate for M/s.V.Janaki Devi for R7 & R9 :No appearance for R8

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

21.01.2026 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No msa To

1. The Secretary to Government Department of School Education Fort St. George Chennai 9.

2. The Director Directorate of School Education DPI Compound College Road Chennai 6.

3. The Director Directorate of Matriculation Education DPI Compound College Road Chennai 6.

4. The Chief Educational Officer Trichirappalli Trichirappalli District.

5. The District Educational Officer Lalgudi, Trichy District.

6. The District Educational Officer (Private Matriculation)

Thennur, Trichy District.

7.The Section Officer V.R.Section Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

msa and WMP(MD) No.3886 of 2023

21.01.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top