SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 9833

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
R.BINDUJA – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (INCHARGE) – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01.12.2025 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.904 of 2024 R.Binduja ... Petitioner Vs

1.The Assistant Director (Incharge)

Office of the Assistant DirectorateGovernment Examinations Tiruvallur-602 011.

2.Chief Educational Officer Office of the Chief Educational Officer Tiruvallur-602 001. 3.The Headmistress Government Higher Secondary School Vengal, Tiruvallur District-601 103. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus after calling for the concerned records from the 2nd and 3rd Respondent, quash the order of the 2nd Respondent dated 15.11.2023 bearing Na.Ka.No.5575/B1/2023 and the order of the 3rd Respondent dated 27.12.2023 bearing Na.Ka.No.86/22023 served on the Petitioner on 27.12.2023 as illegal, arbitrary and contraryto law ans consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate the petitioner with full back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sadasharam For Respondents : Mr.S.Prabhakaran, Government Advocate.

O R D E R

Aggrieved by the order of termination

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top