IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR
A.Kiruthika – Appellant
Versus
N. Anandhan – Respondent
##PAGE1##
2026:MHC:495
CMA No. 185 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05-02-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
CMA No. 185 of 2023
A.Kiruthika Appellant(s)
Vs
N. Anandhan Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of Family Court
Act, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 12.09.2022 made in HMOP
No.1636 of 2017 on the file of the Learned Additional Principal Family Court,
Coimbatore.
For Appellant(s): Ms.M.V.Saranya
for Mr.Shangar Murali
For Respondent(s): Ms.V. Gayathri
JUDGMENT
(Judgment made by N.Sathish Kumar J.)
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been originally filed challenging the
decree and judgment of the Trial Court dated 12.09.2022 dismissing the petition
in HMOP.No.1637 of 2017 seeking for grant of divorce on the ground of
cruelty.
2. When the appeals are taken up for hearing today, both the
appellant/wife and respondent/husband appeared before this Court and they
were identified by their respective counsel. The learned counsel appearing for
the appellant and respondent along with the parties represented that the parties
have arrived at the settlement and are filing a Joint Memo of Compromise dated
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/02/2026 06:03:13 pm )
##PAGE2##CMA No. 185 of 2023
05.02.2026, duly signed by both the appellant as well as respondent and their
respective counsel and prayed for passing of decree of divorce by mutual
consent. The said joint memo of compromise is taken on file and recorded.
3. It is the admitted fact that the marriage between the appellant and the
respondent was solemnised on 03.06.2009. From the wedlock, the minor son
was born on 28.02.2013, later due to strained relationship in the matrimonial
life, the appellant has filed the petition for divorce in the year 2017 and the
parties are not living together from the year 2014 and they are separated for
almost more than 11 years, now, they have reached the settlement agreeing for
divorce by mutual consent.
4. Considering the above, we are of the view that as the parties are in
separation for more than 11 years and there is no chance of reconciliation, we
are inclined to treat the pending application as petition under Section 13B of the
Hindu Marriage Act and waive the period of six months considering the long
pendency of the petition and their separation. Accordingly, the divorce is
granted and the marriage between the appellant and the respondent solemnised
on 03.06.2009 stands dissolved through divorce by mutual consent.
5. In view of the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of by
granting decree of divorce by mutual consent in terms of joint memo of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/02/2026 06:03:13 pm )
##PAGE3##CMA No. 185 of 2023
compromise. The Joint Memo of Compromise dated 05.02.2026 shall form part
of the decree. No costs. The respondent/husband is entitled to visitation rights as
agreed in the joint memo to visit his minor child once in a month, i.e., 3rd
Sunday. The parties shall bind with regard to the other terms as agreed in the
joint compromise memo.
(N.SATHISH KUMAR J.)(R.SAKTHIVEL J.)
05-02-2026
dhk
Index:Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Internet:Yes
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
To
The Additional Principal Judge
Additional Principal Family Court,
Coimbatore
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/02/2026 06:03:13 pm )
##PAGE4##CMA No. 185 of 2023
N.SATHISH KUMAR J.
AND
R.SAKTHIVEL J.
dhk
CMA No. 185 of 2023
05-02-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/02/2026 06:03:13 pm )
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.