SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 8370

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
D.THAMARAISELVAN – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary – Respondent
WP No. 2203 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. Esakkiraja
For the Respondents: U. Baranidharan

A registering officer must consider all relevant title documents, including registered Wills, before refusing registration; if a refusal is based on one document while ignoring another, the matter must be reconsidered and decided via a speaking order.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash a refusal check slip issued by the Sub Registrar regarding the registration of an Agreement of Sale Deed. The petitioner claimed title through a registered Will dated 04.10.1996, asserting inheritance as the sole legal heir. The court found that the refusal was based on a partition deed without considering the aforementioned Will. The primary issue was whether the refusal to register the document was legal given the existence of a registered Will. The court observed that since the refusal check slip only cited a partition deed and ignored the registered Will, the decision lacked comprehensive consideration of all title documents, necessitating a reconsideration of the request. The writ petition stands disposed of on the above terms without any order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges registration refusal based on a registered will. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondent justifies refusal based on a registered partition deed. (Para 3)
3. court orders reconsideration and issuance of a speaking order. (Para 4 , 5)

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the record of the 4th respondent Refusal Check Slip No.RFL/ Nallur-Tiruppur / 33/ 2025 dated 04.07.2025 and quash the same as illegal and to consequently directing the 4th respondent herein to register the Agreement of Sale Deed dated 04.07.2025 and to fix the time frame by this Honourable Court.

ORDER

The petitioner traces title through his mother Subbammal, who is said to be the legatee from Muthusamy Gounder under a Will. By asserting that Will dated 04.10.1996 came into force upon the death of the testator on 21.02.2005, it is stated that the petitioner inherited the property from his mother as the sole legal heir. Upon presenting an agreement of sale, the request for registration was declined under the impugned refusal check slip.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the registering officer did not take into consideration registered Will dated 04.10.1996 bearing document no.257/1996. Therefore, he submits that the impugned refusal check slip is liable to be set aside.

3. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for all the respondents. He submits that the request for registration was rejected in view of registered partition deed bearing document no.1634/2005 in respect of the same property. He placed reliance on a recent judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in S.Amalraj v. C.Sivakumar and another , judgment dated 22.01.2026 in W.A.(MD)No.8 of 2026 for the principle that the subsequent document should be construed as a forged document. Without prejudice, he submits that the matter may be remanded for reconsideration after issuing notice to all persons interested in the property.

4. On perusal of the impugned refusal check slip, it is noticeable that the primary reason for refusal is partition deed bearing document no.1634/2005. There is no reference to registered Will dated 04.10.1996 bearing document no.257/1996. Therefore, reconsideration is warranted. To facilitate the same, the refusal check slip is set aside and the petitioner is permitted to re-present the agreement of sale for registration. Within 30 days from such re-presentation, after issuing notice to the parties to partition deed bearing document no.1634/2005 and to the petitioner, either the document should be registered or a speaking order of refusal under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908 shall be issued.

5. The writ petition stands disposed of on the above terms without any order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top