SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 8498

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R. Vijayakumar, J
S.YAKKIAH (M/50) – Appellant
Versus
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER – Respondent
WP(MD).No.20005 of 2018 | WMP(MD).No.17784 of 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: J. Jeyakumaran
For the Respondents: S. Deenadhayalan

Disputes regarding electricity consumption charges arising from defective meters must be adjudicated by the Appellate Authority under the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code 2004 rather than through a writ petition.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to set aside an order regarding electricity consumption charges, citing Rule 11(2)(3) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code 2004. The petitioner contended that the demand for charges between June 2018 and September 2018 was exorbitant due to a defective meter. The court observed that the grievance pertained to the accuracy of the meter. The central issue was whether the court could entertain a challenge to electricity charges based on a defective meter in a writ petition. The court reasoned that under Regulation 11(7) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code 2004, the appropriate remedy is to approach the Appellate Authority, and such issues cannot be considered within the scope of the present writ petition. this writ petition stands disposed of.

Table of Content
1. challenge to electricity consumption charges based on allegations of a defective meter. (Para 1 , 2)
2. requirement to exhaust statutory remedies via the appellate authority for meter disputes. (Para 3 , 4)
3. disposal of the writ petition directing the petitioner to the appropriate forum. (Para 5)

Prayer:

This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in Letter No.UMIPO/EKA/PULI/KO.Kattu A.No.126/18-19 dated 10.09.2018 and set aside the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents, to assess the correct electricity consumption charges, to the service connection number 277-001-1657, in Thangam Steel rolling Mill, situated at Oomanthur Village, Trichy District as contemplated in Rule 11(2)(3) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code 2004 .

ORDER

The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the second respondent wherein the petitioner has been called upon to pay current consumption charges for the period between June 2018 to September 2018.

2.It could be seen from the impugned order that the petitioner has not paid the said consumption charges on the ground that they are exhorbitant and due to the defective meter, this demand is being made.

3.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that in case if any allegation of defective meter, it is for the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority under Regulation 11(7) of Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004.

4.The issue relating to the defective meter cannot be considered in this writ petition. It is open to the writ petitioner to challenge the same before the Appellate Authority.

5.With the above said observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top