IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and CMP No.1890 of 2024

1. Dhanabakkiyammal @ Dhanabakkiyam W/o Late Munusamy Reddiar, Reddy St, Panapakkam Village, Palavakkam Post, Petitioner(s)

Uthukottai (Via). Uthukottai Tk, Tiruvallur Dt Vs

1. C.Kotteaswara Reddy S/o Late Duraisamy Reddy, Seenikuppam Village, Palavakkam Post, Uthukottai Tk, Respondent(s)

Tiruvallur Dt For Petitioner(s): Mr. G.Jermiah For Respondent(s): Mr. S.Sathish

ORDER

Heard Mr.G.Jermiah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Sathish, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. The plaintiff in O.S.No.111 of 2021 before the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur is the revision petitioner, aggrieved by the order of the trial Court allowing the application to condone the delay of 94 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree under Order IX Rule 13 of Civil Procedure Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would state that the respondent had come to Court with a false affidavit and the Court having given a finding that the petitioner has not made out sufficient cause, ought not to have condoned the delay. He would