SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 8634

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
PUSHPANATHAN – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 09.02.2026 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN H.C.P. No.189 of 2026 Pushpanathan .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Ranipet District.

2. The State rep. By The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Ranipet District. Cr.No.202/2025.

3. Thennarasu .. Respondents Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body of the petitioner’s wife by name P.Chitra aged about 33 years, born on 22.10.1992, wife of Purushothaman, before this Court and set her at liberty forthwith.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Harish For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor Assisted by Mr.M.Karthikeyan *****

ORDER

(The Order of the Court was made by P.Velmurugan, J)

This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce his wife named P.Chitra aged about 33 years, born on

22.10.1992.

2 Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court on 03.02.2026, the respondents secured the petitioner’s wife and produced before this Court today.

3 On enquiry by this Court, the detenue has informed that she only on her own wish went along with the third respondent. Therefore it is clear that the petitioner’s wife has not been detained illegally and she only went along with third respondent and it appears that there is family dispute between the petitioner and his wife.

4 In view of the above facts and since there is no illegal detention, this Court is not inclined to exercise power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

5 Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed. However, the parties are at liberty to workout their remedy in the manner known to law before the competent forum.

(P.V., J) (M.J.R., J)

09.02.2026 cgi Neutral Citation: Yes/No To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Ranipet District.

2. The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Ranipet District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

cgi

09.02.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top