IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
Dhanapal – Appellant
Versus
Kamala (Died) 1.Kala – Respondent
##PAGE1##
C.R.P.No.472 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.02.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P.No.472 of 2026
and
C.M.P.No.2620 of 2026
Dhanapal ... Petitioner
vs.
Kamala (Died)
1.Kala
2.Thangaraj
3.Ramyapriya
4.Kanagavalli
5.Chitra ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, to set aside the order and decree dated 28.11.2025 in
I.A.No.05 of 2025 in O.S.No.147 of 2016 on the file of District Munsif,
Sholinghur, Ranipet District, by allowing the present Civil Revision
Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Gouthaman
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/02/2026 01:18:00 pm )
##PAGE2##C.R.P.No.472 of 2026
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by
the District Munsif, Sholinghur, Ranipet District in I.A.No.05 of 2025 in
O.S.No.147 of 2016, dated 28.11.2025 dismissing the application filed by
the petitioner/1st defendant seeking leave to file additional written statement.
2. The respondents 1 to 3 herein filed a suit seeking partition and
separate possession. The petitioner/1st defendant already filed a written
statement, wherein he had pleaded that there was a Oral Partition in the year
1974 between the legal heirs of the deceased Ponnusamy and his son and
under the said partition, the suit schedule properties were allotted to him.
Now, the instant application has been filed by the petitioner seeking leave to
file additional written statement.
3. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it was stated by the
petitioner that in the original statement without his knowledge, certain facts
were introduced regarding partition in the year 1974 and allotment of share
in favour of the petitioner and therefore, to clarify the position that there was
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/02/2026 01:18:00 pm )
##PAGE3##C.R.P.No.472 of 2026
no partition in the year 1974, the petitioner wanted to file additional written
statement. The said application was dismissed by the Trial Court and
aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has come before this Court.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would
vehemently contend that the plea regarding Oral Partition in the year 1974
was introduced by previous counsel without consent of the petitioner.
Therefore, to clarify that position, the petitioner may be permitted to file an
additional written statement.
5. Earlier, the petitioner filed written statement pleading 1974
Partition and allotment of share in his favour. Now, by way of additional
written statement, he wants to take diametrically opposite plea by pleading
that there was no Partition in the year 1974. The plea sought to be
introduced by way of additional written statement is mutually destructive in
nature and by virtue of additional written statement, the petitioner
effectively wants to withdraw his earlier pleadings.
6. It is settled law that additional written statement to introduce a
plea which is mutually destructive with earlier plea cannot be accepted.
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/02/2026 01:18:00 pm )
##PAGE4##C.R.P.No.472 of 2026
Further, the reason given by the petitioner to file additional written
statement also cannot be accepted.
7. The petitioner verified the earlier written statement and affixed his
signature. In such circumstances, he cannot say that without his knowledge,
certain averments were made in the written statement by the previous
counsel. Such stand taken by the petitioner will defeat the very sanctity and
the object of the pleadings. Therefore, I do not find any error in the
impugned order passed by the District Munsif, Sholinghur, Ranipet District
in I.A.No.05 of 2025 in O.S.No.147 of 2016, dated 28.11.2025.
8. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.
05.02.2026
Index : Yes / No
Speaking order : Yes / No
Neutral Citation : Yes / No
dm
4/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.