SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 8845

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, CJ, G. Arul Murugan, J
M/S.SRINIVASA PUBLICITY – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent
W.P.No.3669 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S. Rajendra Kumar, S. I. Sharukumar
For the Respondents: D. B. R. Prabhu

A petitioner cannot seek the adjustment or withdrawal of a license fee if no such right is provided under the applicable Scheme of the Act.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to adjust a license fee of Rs.5,18,400/- paid for a licensed hoarding to any other licensed hoarding based on multiple representations. The court found that the request for adjustment lacked a legal basis. The core issue was whether the petitioner possessed a legal right to seek the adjustment or withdrawal of a license fee. The court held that there is no subsisting right to seek adjustment or withdrawal of license fee under the Scheme of the Act. Petition is dismissed.

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus by directing the Respondents to adjust the license fee of Rs.5,18,400/- paid by the Petitioner for the Licensed Hoarding bearing License No. 51/2024-25(P.H), erected at New No.642, Old No.487, Anna Salai, Teynampet (Nandanam), Chennai - 600035 for the license year 2025-26 (2nd year) towards the license fee of any other Licensed Hoarding erected by the Petitioner, based on the Petitioner's representations dated 18.08.2025, 03.09.2025, 18.11.2025 and 18.12.2025 within a specified time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajendra Kumar

For Mr.S.I.Sharukumar

For Respondents : Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu

Standing Counsel

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

Petitioner is seeking a direction to respondents for consideration of its application for adjustment of license fee.

The prayer of petitioner cannot be considered, as, there is no subsisting right to seek adjustment or withdrawal of license fee under the Scheme of the Act.

Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top