SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 8907

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R. Vijayakumar, J
Tirunelveli Sivakasi Hindu N – Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar (Soci – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.2694 of 2026 | W.M.P(MD)No.2289 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A. Mohan
For the Respondents: K.S. Selvaganesan

A decision regarding the quorum of a society's general body meeting must be based on the actual verified membership strength, requiring documentary evidence for any claims of deceased or removed members.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Certiorarified Mandamus to quash an order dated 13.01.2026. The respondent had rejected the submission of Form VII and the Annual Report for 2024-2025 on the grounds that the Annual General Body Meeting held on 10.08.2025 lacked the required 50% quorum, as only 83 out of 170 members attended. The court found that the respondent failed to consider the petitioner's explanation regarding the death of three members and the removal of one member. The central issue was whether the rejection of Form VII was sustainable without verifying the actual membership strength. The court reasoned that the authority could not arrive at a decision regarding the quorum unless the resolution for the removal of a member and the death certificates of the deceased members were produced and verified. the order impugned in the writ petition is hereby set aside and the matter is remitted back to the file of the respondent herein.

Table of Content
1. rejection of statutory filings due to failure to meet quorum requirements as per society by-laws. (Para 1 , 2)
2. necessity of providing documentary evidence to prove changes in membership strength for quorum calculation. (Para 3 , 4)
3. remittal of the matter to the authority for fresh consideration upon verification of evidence. (Para 5 , 6)

PRAYER:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.4544/E1/2025 dated 13.01.2026 and quash the same as illegal arbitrary and unsustainable in law and consequently direct the respondent to accept the Form VII Submitted by the petitioner on 02.09.2025 long with the Annual Report for the year 2024-2025 and the list of elected office bearers by taking into account the actual members strength of the Society as on the date of the Annual General Body Meeting held on 10.08.2025.

For Petitioner : M/s.A.Mohan

For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan

Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the respondent herein wherein the Form-VII filed by the petitioner's Association has been rejected primarily on the ground that there was no quorum in this said meeting wherein the general body was conducted.

2. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that out of 170 members, only 83 of them have attended the meeting. As per the by-laws, 50% of the members have to attend the meeting. Since there was no quorum in the general body, the Form-VII submitted by the petitioner has been rejected.

3. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, along with Form-VII, they have enclosed an explanation to the effect that three members have passed away and one of them has been removed. This explanation has not been considered and the present impugned order has been passed.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that unless the resolution under which one of the members is removed and the death certificate of the members are produced, the authority could not arrive at any decision.

5. Considering the above said facts, the order impugned in the writ petition is hereby set aside and the matter is remitted back to the file of the respondent herein. The petitioner is directed to produce the resolution under which one of the members was removed and the death certificate of the three members. In case if the respondent is satisfied, thereafter, proceed to pass order in accordance with law.

6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands allowed to the extent as stated above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top