SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 9178

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
R.VASANTHA – Appellant
Versus
The Addiional chief secretary to government – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY R.Vasantha .. Petitioner vs

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Water Resources Department (WRD), Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

3.The Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department (WRD), Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 4.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District.

5.The Executive Engineer, Kosasthalaiyar Basin Division, Water Resources Department (WRD), No.157, J.N. Road, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur Taluk and District. 6.The Special Tahsildar (L.A.), Chennai City Waterways Scheme, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053.

7.The Tahsildar, Kundrathur Taluk, Kundrathur, Kancheepuram District. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the impugned order of the fourth respondent passed in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.61288/2003/F2 dated 12.01.2026, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay fair and reasonable compensation under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top