SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 9197

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE
S.SANTOSHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.02.2026 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.3785 of 2026 S.Santoshkumar S/o.A.Swaminthan (Late), No.1/79, Muvarasampettai Main Road, Muvasarasampettai, Madipakkam, Chennai- 600 091.

Petitioner Vs

1.The Commissioner Saint Thomas Mount Union, Chennai-600 064.

2.The Block Development Officer Saint Thomas Mount Union, Sitalapakkam, Chennai-600 064.

3.The Tahsildar Pallavaram, Chennai.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer Thambaram, Chennai- 600 045.

5.The President Muvarasampettai Village, Chengalpattu District.

6.The District Collector Chengalpattu District.

7.Naveen S/o.Magesvararao, Muvarasampettai Main Road, Muvasarasampettai, Madipakkam, Chennai-600 091.

Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 5th respondent to take an appropriate action based on consider the petitioner representation dated 04.11.2025 within a stipulated time framed by this Hon’ble Court.

For Petitioner: Mr.Murugananthan.K. For Respondents: Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate for R1 to R6 ORDER (O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top