SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 9365

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
CHINNUSAMY – Appellant
Versus
IRULAPPAN(DIED) – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Chinnusamy ..Appellant(s)

Vs

1. Irulappan(died)

2. E.Raja

3. E.Latha

4. E.Bharathi

5. Karuppayammal [R2 to R5 brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole respondent vide order dated 27.04.2019 in MP.Nos.1 and 2 of 2008 in S.A.No.227 of 2007] ..Respondent(s)

Prayer To set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 20.03.2006 made in A.S.No.195 of 2005 on the file of the Court of Principal Sub-ordinate Judge, Slaem, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 24.08.2005 made in O.S.No.2433 of

2004 on the file of the Court of District Munsif, Salem.

For Appellant(s): M/s.V.Ambika for Mr.N.S.Sivakumar For Respondent(s): M/s.Zeeanth Begum For R2 To R5

JUDGMENT

This second appeal is at the instance of the appellant/ defendant against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the lower appellate court. Originally, the suit in O.S.No.2433 of 2004 was laid by the Respondent No.1 herein for recovery of an amount of Rs.90,000/- together with interest against the appellant herein, based on a pronote. During pendancy of this second appeal, the Respondent No.1 died. Hence, the Respondents 3 to 5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top