IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.Sivabooshani Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector Chengalpattu, District Collector office, Grand Southern Trunk Road, Chenglapattu, Venbakakm, Tamil nadu

603 111

2.The Revenue Divisional officer Tambaram Taluk, Taluk office complex, 1st Floor, Opposite MEPZ, Kadaper Village, GST Road, Tambaram West, Chennai 45 3.Tashildar Tambaram W4PG plus 4P7, Chennai -

Trichy Hwy, chitlapakkam,' West Tambaram, Tambara Chennai 600 045

4.Rakesh kumar Durgar Respondent(s)

PRAYER to cancel the patta in the name of Rakesh Kumar Dugar, the 4th respondent herein and to resotre the patta in the name of the petitioner by considering petitioner representation dated 03.11.2025 within the time frame fixed by this Honble Court For Petitioner(s): Mr M.Vinoth For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For R1 to R3 ND/W - R4 -Pvt

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the second respondent to cancel the patta issued in the name of the fourth respondent for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.The petitioner claims that the fourth respondent has illegally obtained patta for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner has filed supporting documents along with this writ petition to substantiate her case that the patta has been issued illegally in favour of the fourth respondent. The petitioner had given a representation on 03.11.2025 to the second respondent seeking for cancellation of patta standing in the name of the fourth respondent. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse order is passed against the fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the official respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the fourth respondent and any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 03.11.2025 seeking for cancellation of patta standing in the name of the fourth respondent for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the fourth respondent and also any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

11-02-2026 vga To

1.The District Collector Chengalpattu, District Collector office, Grand Southern Trunk Road, Chenglapattu, Venbakakm, Tamil nadu

603 111

2.The Revenue Divisional officer Tambaram Taluk, Taluk office complex, 1st Floor, Opposite MEPZ, Kadaper Village, GST Road, Tambaram West, Chennai 45 3.Tashildar Tambaram W4PG plus 4P7, Chennai -

Trichy Hwy, chitlapakkam,' West Tambaram, Tambara Chennai 600 045 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.

vga

11-02-2026