SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 9670

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
N.MUNISH PUROTHIT – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT II SUB REGISTRAR – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.No.43882 of 2025 N.Munish Purothit S/o.Narayan Singh, No.34/35, Kamatchi Amman Koil St, Behind Old Bus Stand, Tiruppur- 641

604.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Joint II Sub Registrar Office Of The Sub Registrar, Neriperichal, Tiruppur- 641 602.

2. The Executive Officer Vishweshwara Swamy Veeraghava Perumal Thirukovil, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments, Tiruppur- 641 604.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quashing the 1st respondent order in Na.Ka. No.227/ 2024 dated 04.11.2024 as unconstitutional and to further direct the 1st respondent to register and release the sale deed in respect of S.No.191/8 measuring 6.32 cents at Tirupur Taluk and District.

(PRAYER AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED 20.11.2025 MADE IN WMP.50297/2025 IN WP.39112/2025 BY KRJ)

For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.P.K.Gowtham For Respondent(s): Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr.K.Karthikeyan, Government Advocate for R2 *********

ORDER

Intending to purchase property measuring 6.32 cents in Survey No.191 of 8, a sale deed was executed in favour of the petitioner on 28.06.2024. When presented for registration, the request for registration was refused under impugned order dated 04.11.2024.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first respondent erroneously concluded that it is the property of the second respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the second respondent submits that a service inam was granted earlier and the same was revoked for breach of conditions. Learned Special Government Pleader submits that the order was issued under Section 71 of the Registration Act and that an appeal lies under Section 72 thereof.

4. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that it is a speaking order under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. An appeal lies therefrom under Section 72 before the District Registrar. Considering the ground of refusal, namely, that the property is owned by the second respondent, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to approach the District Registrar by way of appeal under Section 72. By leaving it open to the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 72, this writ petition is disposed of. Since the petitioner filed this writ petition in October 2025 and prosecuted the same diligently and bona-fide, if the appeal were to be filed within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the Appellate Authority is directed to receive and dispose of the same on merits without going into the limitation period. No costs.

Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed.

10-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To

1. The Joint II Sub Registrar Office Of The Sub Registrar, Neriperichal, Tiruppur- 641 602.

2. The Executive Officer Vishweshwara Swamy Veeraghava Perumal Thirukovil, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments, Tiruppur- 641 604.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

RNA and W.M.P.No.43882 of 2025

10-02-2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top