SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 9686

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Kanakamma – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.02.2026 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Kanakamma ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri Taluk.

4.The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to reclassify the property comprised in Survey No.498 at measuring about 1.39 acres, situated at Mookandapalli, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District from Kallakuthu (Stony Ground) to Sarkar Poramboke (Residential Category) and consequently issue patta in the petitioner name for the extent of 5 cents, by considering her representation dated 29.12.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to re-classify the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition as patta land and thereafter, issue patta in the name of the petitioner, based on her representation, dated 29.12.2025.

2. The petitioner claims that she is in possession of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition for a long number of years. The petitioner seeks for re-classifaction of the subject property as patta land of the petitioner. The petitioner also seeks for issuance of patta in her name for the subject property. The petitioner had given a representation on 29.12.2025 to the respondents for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1st respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation, dated 29.12.2025 seeking for re-classification of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition as patta land and thereafter, issue patta in the name of the petitioner for the subject property, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

10.02.2026 Index : Yes / No (7/9)

Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp To

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri Taluk.

4.The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE , J .

sp

10.02.2026 (7/9)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top