SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 11597

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR
SANKARLAL – Appellant
Versus
SELVARAJ – Respondent


BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 06.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.R.P(MD). No.99 of 2023 Sankarlal ...Revision Petitioner/

Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs

1.Selvaraj

2.Dathi ... Respondents/Respondents/

Defendants PRAYER:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order, dated 14-10-2022 passed in I.A.No.9 of 2022 in O.S.No.21 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For R1 and R2 : M/s.J.Anwandhavalli

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the trial Court rejecting the application filed for appointment of Advocate Commissioner, dated 14-10-2022 in I.A.No.9 of 2022 in O.S.No.21 of 2015 by the learned Principal District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai.

2. The trial Court, vide order dated 14.10.2022 has passed the following orders:

10. This court is aware of the fact that even in a suit for bare injunction, an Advocate Commissioner can be appointed. It is not a complete bar for a Court to appoint an Advocate Commissioner in a suit for bare injunction. However, such an app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top