IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
MOHAMMED HAROON – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Mohammed Haroon, S/o.Mohamed Adil, Residing At No.41/9, 6th Street, A Block, 3rd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai- 600 102. … Petitioner Vs.
1. University Grants Commission Rep By Its Secretary, Prof.Manish R.Joshi, Ministry Of Education, Govt. Of India, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002.
2.National Assessment And Accreditation Council (NAAC)
Represented By Its Director, Prof Ganesan Kannabiran, P.O. Box No.1075, Nagarbhavi, Opp.To NLSIU, Bangalore-560 072.
3.Saveetha Institute Of Medical And Technical Sciences, Rep By Its Registrar, 162, Poonamallee High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai-077. … Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein to instruct the 3rd respondent Deemed University to immediately issue the B.A., LLB., (Hons) Degree Certificate without insisting any convocation fee and any penalty fee and to conduct an enquiry under Section 29(1) of University Grants Commission (Institutions deemed to be Universities) Regulations, 2023.
For Petitioner: M/s.B.S.Sinega For Respondents: M/s.Vinithra Srinivasan, for R2 M/s.U.Sudha, for R1 Notice served for R3
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the first respondent to inspect the 3rd respondent Deemed University to issue the B.A., LL.B., (Honours) degree certificate without insisting on any convocation fee and the penalty fee and to conduct an enquiry under Section 29(1) of the University Grants Commission Regulations, 2023.
2. Upon hearing the Learned Counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to participate in the convocation and for those of the candidates who are not willing to participate in the convocation, the 3rd respondent University is insisting on the convocation fee and also further penalty for not paying the convocation fee in time.
3. The Learned Counsel for the second respondent submits that a counter affidavit has been filed and since they are nothing prayed as the second respondent namely, National Assessment and Accreditation Council, no time need be extended as far as the second respondent. The contention of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent is not entitled to collect the said fee and the degree certificate has to be granted to the petitioner.
4. The writ petition is resisted by the 3rd respondent, even though notice is served.
5. In view thereof, the writ petition is allowed on the following terms:
The 3rd respondent shall forthwith send the B.A., LL.B., (Honours) degree certificate to the petitioner by registered post with due acknowledgement to the address of the petitioner at No.41/9, 6th Street, A Block, 3rd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai- 600 102, within one week from the date of receipt of the web copy of this order, without waiting for the certified copy of the order.
There shall be no order as to costs.
06-02-2026 bsm To
1. The Secretary, University Grants Commission Prof.Manish R.Joshi, Ministry Of Education, Govt. Of India, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002.
2. The Director National Assessment And Accreditation Council (NAAC)
Prof Ganesan Kannabiran, P.O. Box No.1075, Nagarbhavi, Opp.To NLSIU, Bangalore-560 072.
3. The Registrar, Saveetha Institute Of Medical And Technical Sciences
162, Poonamallee High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai-077.
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
bsm
06-02-2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.