SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 11802

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
PRATHAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State Rep.by The Inspector of Police – Respondent



##PAGE1##

Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026

and Crl.M.P.No.1738 of 2026

Prathap Singh ... Petitioner

Vs.

1. State represented by,

The Inspector of Police,

Crime Department,

C-2, Elephant Gate Police Station,

Chennai – 600 079.

2. Manoj Kheto ... Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to call for the records in connection

with the First Information Report in Crime No.228 of 2025 on the file of the

first respondent police and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.Bheru Singh

For R1 : Mr.S.Santhosh

Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/02/2026 03:53:06 pm )

##PAGE2##

Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026

O R D E R

The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to

quash the First Information Report in Crime No.228 of 2025, pending on

the file of the first respondent police.

2. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent/de

facto complainant, a goldsmith, alleging that the accused had induced him

and received 574.430 grams of gold jewels worth about Rs.28,72,150/- and

cheated him, the first respondent police registered the aforesaid case in

Crime No.228 of 2025, for the offences under Sections 409 & 420 of IPC

on 30.04.2025, which is now sought to be quashed.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that

even as per the complaint, the petitioner, who is arrayed as A2 in Crime

No.228 of 2025, and the de facto complainant are known to each other and

that there is absolutely no material to show that the petitioner has

committed the aforesaid offences. He further submitted that the gold jewels

were handed over only in the course of business transactions. He also

contended that even taking the entire averments in the FIR at their face

value, the ingredients of the alleged offences cannot be made out against the

2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/02/2026 03:53:06 pm )

##PAGE3##

Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026

petitioner. Hence, he prayed to quash the First Information Report pending

against the petitioner.

4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

submitted that the petitioner and other accused are brothers and that the

second respondent/de facto complainant had earlier approached this Court

in Crl.O.P.No.20618 of 2025 seeking a direction to complete the

investigation and file the final report. This Court, vide order dated

23.07.2025, had directed the first respondent herein to expedite the

investigation and file the final report at the earliest. Subsequent to the said

order, one of the accused/A3 was arrested and later released on bail. He

further submitted that the petitioner is an absconding accused and that

despite issuance of summons, he has not appeared for investigation. He also

submitted that the investigation is at a very nascent stage. He reiterated that

since the investigation in this case is at still at a preliminary stage and

requires a thorough investigation, this Court ought not to interdict the same

under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Hence, he objected to quashing the case against

the petitioner.

5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and

upon perusal of the materials available on record and taking note of the fact

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/02/2026 03:53:06 pm )

##PAGE4##

Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026

that the petitioner, an absconding accused, has not cooperated in the

investigation and that the investigation is at a preliminary stage, this Court

is not inclined to interfere with the investigation and does not find any merit

in this petition seeking to quash the First Information Report.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. However, the

first respondent police is directed to conduct the investigation and to file the

final report as expeditiously as possible.

05.0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top