2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 11802
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
PRATHAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State Rep.by The Inspector of Police – Respondent
##PAGE1##
Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.02.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026
and Crl.M.P.No.1738 of 2026
Prathap Singh ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. State represented by,
The Inspector of Police,
Crime Department,
C-2, Elephant Gate Police Station,
Chennai – 600 079.
2. Manoj Kheto ... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to call for the records in connection
with the First Information Report in Crime No.228 of 2025 on the file of the
first respondent police and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.Bheru Singh
For R1 : Mr.S.Santhosh
Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/02/2026 03:53:06 pm )
##PAGE2##Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026
O R D E R
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to
quash the First Information Report in Crime No.228 of 2025, pending on
the file of the first respondent police.
2. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent/de
facto complainant, a goldsmith, alleging that the accused had induced him
and received 574.430 grams of gold jewels worth about Rs.28,72,150/- and
cheated him, the first respondent police registered the aforesaid case in
Crime No.228 of 2025, for the offences under Sections 409 & 420 of IPC
on 30.04.2025, which is now sought to be quashed.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that
even as per the complaint, the petitioner, who is arrayed as A2 in Crime
No.228 of 2025, and the de facto complainant are known to each other and
that there is absolutely no material to show that the petitioner has
committed the aforesaid offences. He further submitted that the gold jewels
were handed over only in the course of business transactions. He also
contended that even taking the entire averments in the FIR at their face
value, the ingredients of the alleged offences cannot be made out against the
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/02/2026 03:53:06 pm )
##PAGE3##Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026
petitioner. Hence, he prayed to quash the First Information Report pending
against the petitioner.
4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
submitted that the petitioner and other accused are brothers and that the
second respondent/de facto complainant had earlier approached this Court
in Crl.O.P.No.20618 of 2025 seeking a direction to complete the
investigation and file the final report. This Court, vide order dated
23.07.2025, had directed the first respondent herein to expedite the
investigation and file the final report at the earliest. Subsequent to the said
order, one of the accused/A3 was arrested and later released on bail. He
further submitted that the petitioner is an absconding accused and that
despite issuance of summons, he has not appeared for investigation. He also
submitted that the investigation is at a very nascent stage. He reiterated that
since the investigation in this case is at still at a preliminary stage and
requires a thorough investigation, this Court ought not to interdict the same
under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Hence, he objected to quashing the case against
the petitioner.
5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and
upon perusal of the materials available on record and taking note of the fact
3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/02/2026 03:53:06 pm )
##PAGE4##Crl.O.P.No.2598 of 2026
that the petitioner, an absconding accused, has not cooperated in the
investigation and that the investigation is at a preliminary stage, this Court
is not inclined to interfere with the investigation and does not find any merit
in this petition seeking to quash the First Information Report.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.
Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. However, the
first respondent police is directed to conduct the investigation and to file the
final report as expeditiously as possible.
05.0