SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 11894

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice T. VINOD KUMAR
R.Parthiban – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu – Respondent



##PAGE1##

W.P.No.9729 of 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

W.P.No . 9729 of 202 1

R.Parthiban ... Petitioner

vs

1. State of Tamil Nadu,

Rep. By its Additional Chief

Secretary to Government,

Home (Police – 5) Department,

Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2. The Director General of Police,

Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore,

Chennai – 600 004.

3. The Assistant Inspector General of Police,

Technical Service, Chennai – 600 004.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Police Computer Wing,

Chennai. … Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records

pertaining to the impugned order of the latest order of rejection passed by the first

respondent in his letter (Ms).No.46, Home (Police-5) Department, Secretariat,

dated 02.02.2021 confirming the orders of the third respondent in his TSO

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/02/2026 04:31:48 pm )

##PAGE2##

W.P.No.9729 of 2021

No.97/96, dated 16.03.1996 corresponding order in PR No.21/95 dated 15.03.1996

of the third respondent and quash them, as they were against all canons of law and

consequently directing the authority to pay all service and attendant benefits and

terminal and pensionary benefits and pass orders.

For Petitioner : No Appearance

For Respondents : Mrs.V.Yamunadevi

Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

Despite the matter being listed on 07.01.2026 and 04.02.2026, there was no

representation for the petitioner.

2. Even today (05.02.2026) when the matter is listed under the caption 'for

dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which only goes to

show that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for

non-prosecution. No costs.

05.02.2026

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Index : Yes / No

Neutral Citation : Yes / No

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/02/2026 04:31:48 pm )

##PAGE3##

W.P.No.9729 of 2021

dh

To

1. State of Tamil Nadu,

Rep. By its Additional Chief

Secretary to Government,

Home (Police – 5) Department,

Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2. The Director General of Police,

Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore,

Chennai – 600 004.

3. The Assistant Inspector General of Police,

Technical Service, Chennai – 600 004.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Police Computer Wing,

Chennai.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/02/2026 04:31:48 pm )

##PAGE4##

W.P.No.9729 of 2021

T. VINOD KUMAR , J .

dh

W.P.No.9729 of 2021

05.02.2026

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/02/2026 04:31:48 pm )

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top