SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 12069

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
A.Mathivanan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
WP No. 3465 of 2026|WMP. No.3900 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G. Sankaran, S. Nedunchezhiyan
For the Respondents: C. Selvaraj

The court directed the administrative authority to consider and decide upon a fresh representation regarding promotion grievances on merits and in accordance with law.

Headnote:The petitioners, serving as Forest Range Officers for over eight years, challenged an order dated 09.01.2025 issued under the authority of the State Government, seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. They contended that they were eligible for promotion to the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests but were excluded from the 2022-2023 promotion panel, and their subsequent claims were rejected by the first respondent. The primary issue was whether the petitioners' exclusion from the promotion panel was justified and whether they were entitled to be promoted on par with their juniors. The court observed that the grievances regarding the promotion panel and the subsequent rejection order required a detailed consideration on merits by the administrative authority. The court directed the petitioners to submit a representation to the first respondent within two weeks, and the first respondent was ordered to consider and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law within six weeks.

Table of Content
1. eligibility for promotion to the post of assistant conservator of forests based on length of service. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. requirement for administrative authorities to dispose of representations regarding service grievances on merits and in accordance with law. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 1st respondent in Letter No.6414948/FR.1/2024-1 dated 09.01.2025, served on the Petitioners on 12.03.2025 and to Quash the same and consequently directing the Respondents to include the name of the Petitioners in 2022-2023 panel and to promote the petitioners to the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests on par with junior with all consequential and other attendant benefits.

ORDER

The impugned order issued by the first respondent in Letter No.6414948/FR.1/2024-1 dated 09.01.2025, served on the petitioners on 12.03.2025, is put under challenge in the present Writ Petition. Further, the petitioners had sought for a direction to the respondents to include their names in 2022-2023 panel and to promote them to the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests on par with their juniors with all consequential and other attendant benefits.

2. Heard the learned counsels on either side. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself.

3. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are Forest Range Officers, who have rendered service for more than eight years in the said cadre in the respondent Department and are eligible for promotion to the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests, however their names have not been included in the 2022-23 promotion panel. He further submitted that due to non inclusion of their names in the aforesaid promotion panel, the petitioners filed W.P.(MD) No.3146 of 2025 and during the pendency of the said Writ Petition, the order impugned herein has been passed by the first respondent, rejecting their claim. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions put forth by the learned Senior counsel for the petitioners, this Court directs the petitioners to submit a representation to the first respondent ventilating all their grievances, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the first respondent shall consider and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks therefrom.

5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. There shall be no orders as to costs.

6. WMP.No.3899 of 2026 filed by the petitioners to permit them to join together and file a Single Writ Petition is allowed subject to payment of separate Court fee.

04-02-2026

Index: Yes/No

Neutral Citation: Yes/No

DP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top