SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 12073

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
K.Kaliappan – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent



##PAGE1##

W.P. No.3565 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI

W.P. No.3565 of 2025

1.K.Kaliappan

2.S.Purusothaman

3.G.Moorthy Petitioners

Vs

1. Government of Tamil Nadu

Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government,

Environment and Forest Department,

Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

(Head of Forest Force),

Velachery Main Road,

Guindy, Chennai-600 032. Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

praying to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the

notional promotion to the petitioners as Forest Guard on par with juniors by

including their name in the panel drawn for the year 2003-2004 with effect from

31.05.2004 for purpose of getting enhanced pension (petitioner service was

1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/02/2026 01:31:22 pm )

##PAGE2##

W.P. No.3565 of 2026

regularized on par with juniors only now), and in the light of order passed by

our Honorable High Court in WP. No.15726 of 2016 dated 28.04.2016 and

order in W.P. No.30735 of 2019 dated 30.10.2019 and order in W.P. No.1229 of

2024 with dated 23.01.2024 and order in W.P.No.47719 of 2025 dated

15.12.2025 by considering the representation dated 06.10.2025, in the time limit

to be stipulated by this Court.

For petitioners : Mr.S. Mani

For respondents : Dr.T.Seenivasan, SGP

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to

consider the notional promotion to the petitioners as Forest Guard on par with

juniors by including their names in the panel drawn for the year 2003-2004 with

effect from 31.05.2004 for the purpose of getting enhanced pension (petitioners

service were regularized on par with juniors only now), and in the light of the

orders passed by this Court in WP. No.15726 of 2016 dated 28.04.2016; W.P.

No.30735 of 2019 dated 30.10.2019; W.P. No.1229 of 2024 dated 23.01.2024;

and W.P.No.47719 of 2025 dated 15.12.2025, by considering the representation

of the petitioners dated 06.10.2025, within the time limit as fixed by this Court.

2/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/02/2026 01:31:22 pm )

##PAGE3##

W.P. No.3565 of 2026

2. Dr.T.Seenivasan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on

behalf of the respondents. With the consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is

taken up for hearing today, at the admission stage itself.

3. The case of the petitioners is that they joined as Plot Watcher on daily

wage basis in the respondent Department in the year 1982. The names of the

petitioners were included in the State Wide Seniority List drawn in the year

1994. The services of the petitioners were regularized in the cadre of Forest

Watcher notionally based on the directions issued by this Court in W.P.

Nos.5936, 22781 & 22755 of 2014 and notional regularization was given effect

from 24.01.1995. It is the grievance of the petitioners that even though the

services of the petitioners were regularized in the cadre post of Forest Watcher,

notionally, they were not promoted as Forest Guard on par with their juniors.

Furthermore, the writ petitions filed by the similarly placed persons like that of

the petitioners viz., W.P. Nos.15726 of 2016, 30735 of 2019 and 1229 of 2024

were allowed by this Court on 28.04.2016, 30.10.2019 and 23.01.2024

respectively. Therefore, the petitioners made a representation on 06.10.2025

before the respondents to promote them as Forest Guard on par with their

juniors, who have already been given promotion, but till date their

representation was not considered. Hence the present Writ Petition.

3/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/02/2026 01:31:22 pm )

##PAGE4##

W.P. No.3565 of 2026

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that it would suffice,

if a direction is issued to the second respondent to dispose of the petitioners’

representation dated 06.10.2025 on merits and in accordance with law.

5. Dr.T.Seenivasan, learned Special Government Ple

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top