SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 12102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T. Vinod Kumar, J
S.Thangaswamy – Appellant
Versus
The Director of Local Fund Audit – Respondent
WP No. 9882 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.R. Nixon
For the Respondents: K. Tippusulthan Ga

A writ petition may be closed if the grievance is settled during the pendency of the proceedings, rendering the cause of action non-existent.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash an order dated 07-11-2020 and directing the respondents to pay medical expenses of Rs. 46,693.57 with 18 percent interest. During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents settled the reimbursement of the medical claim, although not for the full amount. The court considered whether the cause of action survived given the settlement of the claim. It was observed that since the respondents had settled the medical reimbursement as claimed, the cause in the writ petition did not survive for further consideration. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

Table of Content
1. settlement of claims during the pendency of a writ petition leads to the closure of the case as the cause of action no longer survives. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the Order passed by the 1st Respondent in Mu.Mu.No. 19288/Na.O.Va.(4)/2019, dated 07-11-2020 and quash the same thereby directing the Respondents to pay a sum of Rs. 46,693.57/- spent by the Petitioner towards medical expenses with 18 percent interest from 23-06-2019 until the date of payment and order compensation for mental agony faced by the Petitioner.

ORDER

When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the respondents have settled the reimbursement of medical claim as made by the petitioner though not for the full amount.

2.Learned counsel further submits that since, the respondents have now settled the medical reimbursement as claimed by the petitioner, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration.

3. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents having now settled the medical claim submitted by the petitioner, this Court is of the view that no further order is necessary.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

04-02-2026

Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No

MSV

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top