IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T. Vinod Kumar, J
S.Thangaswamy – Appellant
Versus
The Director of Local Fund Audit – Respondent
WP No. 9882 of 2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement of claims during the pendency of a writ petition leads to the closure of the case as the cause of action no longer survives. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the Order passed by the 1st Respondent in Mu.Mu.No. 19288/Na.O.Va.(4)/2019, dated 07-11-2020 and quash the same thereby directing the Respondents to pay a sum of Rs. 46,693.57/- spent by the Petitioner towards medical expenses with 18 percent interest from 23-06-2019 until the date of payment and order compensation for mental agony faced by the Petitioner.
ORDER
When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the respondents have settled the reimbursement of medical claim as made by the petitioner though not for the full amount.
2.Learned counsel further submits that since, the respondents have now settled the medical reimbursement as claimed by the petitioner, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents having now settled the medical claim submitted by the petitioner, this Court is of the view that no further order is necessary.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. No costs.
04-02-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
MSV
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.