IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI
EVELYN AMRITA RUSSELL – Appellant
Versus
ALEXANDER SAMIMMANUEL RUSSELL – Respondent
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03-02-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP No. 6200 of 2025 and CMP No.30563 of 2025
1. Evelyn Amrita Russell
D/o Daniel Devasirvatham, Rep by her
POA D.Daniel, 1-A, Secretariat Colony,
Baracah Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.
Presently Res. at Richard Wagner Stasse 27,
Petitioner(s)
68165 Mannheim, Germany.
Vs
1. Alexander Samimmanuel Russell
S/o. Russel Victor Paulraj, 11/23, Erran St,
Purasawakkam, Chennai 7. Presently Res.
at Richard - Wagner Strasse 27, 68165
Respondent(s)
Mannheim, Germany.
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to
set aside the docket order dated 13.11.2025 in I.A.No.7 of 2024 in O.P.No.5364 of 2022
on the file of V Additional Family Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner(s): Pushkala
For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Kalyan Jhabakh
For M/s.Surana And Surana
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/02/2026 02:50:47 pm )
##PAGE2##ORDER
The petitioner and the respondent are husband and wife and admittedly, both
do not reside in India. The respondent, as petitioner, has filed a petition in OP No.5364
of 2022, seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty, before the V Additional Family
Court, Chennai. The petition was dismissed for default on 29.07.2025, recording that
both the petitioner and the respondent were absent. The respondent/petitioner herein
took out an application in I.A.No.7 of 2024 for restoring OP No.5364 of 2022 to file and
the petitioner herein was set exparte in the said application on 22.10.2025. An
application was filed by the father of the petitioner/wife, who happens to be a Lawyer
himself. The Court below has passed the following docket order on 13.11.2025, which is
under challenge, in the present revision:-
“Petitioner present. Respondent not present, her father Tr.Daniel
present. He is not ready to answer the questions put to him.
Hence this Court order the power granted to him to the respondent
in this case in IA No.7 of 2024 is revoked. Exparte enquiry by
03.12.2025. Finally respondent to appear on 03.12.25. If she
seems necessary.”
2. Learned counsel for the respondent/husband would submit that the parties
are appearing through video conferencing and both their applications seeking permission
to appear through video conference have already been allowed and therefore, there is no
necessity for the father to represent the petitioner in the revision petition.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/02/2026 02:50:47 pm )
##PAGE3##3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would however state that there is nobody
to represent the interests of the petitioner/wife before the Family Court and only in that
regard, her father sought for permission to represent as Power Agent and initially
permission was also granted in I.A.No.7 of 2024 and the Court has already permitted the
father to represent his daughter, not being an advocate, but being her father, who is the
petitioner herein.
4. I do not see why there was any necessity to revoke the power permission in
the first place. The father of the petitioner would be entitled to represent the petitioner
for the purposes of filing applications and making representations and the oral and
documentary evidence will have to be necessarily adduced by the petitioner/wife, for
which, permission was already granted to appear through video conferencing. The
docket order passed by the Family Court is unsustainable and as pointed out by
Mr.Kalyan Jhabakh, the learned counsel for the respondent, the Family Court has
literally been confused because the father, Power Agent, is himself a lawyer.
5. In the light of the above, the order revoking the authority in I.A.No.7 of
2024 is recalled and set aside. It is made clear that the petitioner alone shall tender
evidence in the main proceedings and the role of the petitioner’s father would be only as
a power agent and merely to present documents and file applications, counter-affidavits
on behalf of her daughter, who is the petitioner herein.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.