IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN
DINESHBABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP.BY – Respondent
##PAGE1##
2026:MHC:507
CRL A No.527 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30-01-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CRL A No.527 of 2023
Dineshbabu
S/o.Ponnusamy,
56-B, Idumban Nagar,
Sivagiripatti,
Palani Taluk,
Dindigul District.
Now at Nadar Street,
Katturputhur,
Dharapuram Taluk,
Tiruppur District.
...Appellant/Accused
Vs
State Rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Dharapuram,
Tiruppur District.
Crime No.06 of 2022.
...Respondent/Complainant
__________
Page1 of 10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/02/2026 01:18:00 pm )
##PAGE2##CRL A No.527 of 2023
Prayer : Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C., to set aside the
Judgment passed in Spl.S.C.No.62 of 2022 on the file of the Sessions Judge,
Magalir Needhi Mandram, (Fast Track Mahila Court) Tiruppur dated
18.08.2022.
For Appellant: M/s.Amala Anathi
for M/S.C.S.Saravanan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar
Additional Public Prosecutor
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the accused, challenging the
Judgment dated 18.08.2022 in Spl.S.C.No.62 of 2022 on the file of the learned
Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandaram, (Fast Track Mahila Court) Tiruppur,
by which he was convicted for the offences under Sections 5(l), 5(m), 5(n) r/w 6
and 3(a) r/w 4(2) of the Protection of Children from the Sexual Offences Act,
2012, (hereinafter referred to as the “POCSO Act”) and Section 506(ii) of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860, (hereinafter referred to as the “IPC”) and sentenced
him as follows:
Offence under Section Sentence imposed
Section 5(l), 5(m), 5(n) r/w 6 To undergo 20 years RI for each count and totally sentenced
of the POCSO Act, 2012 to 60 years RI and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- for each count
in default six months SI.
Section 3(a) r/w 4(2) of the To undergo 20 years RI and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in
POCSO Act, 2012 default to undergo three months SI.
Section 506(ii) of IPC To undergo imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of
Rs.1000/- in default to undergo three months SI.
The sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
__________
Page2 of 10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/02/2026 01:18:00 pm )
##PAGE3##CRL A No.527 of 2023
2(a). The case of the prosecution is that the appellant/accused had
committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim girl, aged about five years,
by inserting his finger in the private part of the victim girl and also by
inappropriately touching her breast.
(b). It is further the case of the prosecution that P.W.2, when the mother
of the victim girl, returned home after completing her duty in a company, she
saw the victim girl sitting on the appellant's lap, and on seeing P.W.2, the
appellant removed his hand from the private part of the victim; and that when
P.W.2 questioned the victim, P.W.1, told her that the appellant had committed
such acts repeatedly and thus, committed the aforesaid offences.
(c). On 24.03.2022, P.W.2, the mother of the victim girl, lodged a
complaint [Ex.P1], which was registered as an FIR [Ex.P7] in Crime No.6 of
2022 for the offences under Sections 5(l), 5(m), 5(n) and 6 of the POCSO Act
and Section 506 (ii) of the IPC. The complaint was registered by P.W.6, the
head constable attached to the respondent police station, and the investigation
was conducted by P.W.7, the inspector of police, AWPS, Dharapuram, who,
after taking steps to record the 164(5) Cr.P.C. statement of the victim girl and
subjecting the victim to medical examination, filed the final report for the
__________
Page3 of 10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/02/2026 01:18:00 pm )
##PAGE4##CRL A No.527 of 2023
offences under Section 506 (ii) of IPC and Sections 3(a) r/w 4(2), 5(l)(m)(n) r/w
6 of the POCSO Act, as against the appellant before the learned Sessions Judge,
Magalir Neethimandaram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruppur.
(d). On the appearance of the accused, the provisions of Section 207
Cr.P.C. were complied with, and the case was taken on file as Spl.S.C.No.62 of
2022 by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.