IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
A.Marimuthu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
##PAGE1##
W.P.Nos.21463 & 6025 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
W.P.Nos.21463 & 6025 of 2016
and
WMP.Nos.5341, 5342 & 18352 of 2016
1.A.Marimuthu
2.M.Murugan
3.N.Chinnarasu ...Petitioners in W.P.No.21463/2016
1.P.Kumaresan
2.S.Shanmugasundaram
3.K.Palanisamy
4.A.Mahalingam
5.S.Balakrishnan ...Petitioners in W.P.No.6025/2016
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu
Represented by its Secretary
Municipal Administration and Water Supply Dept
Fort St.George
Secretariat
Chennai 600 009.
2.The Director of Municipal Administration
Chepauk
Chennai 600 005.
1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 16/02/2026 03:54:42 pm )
##PAGE2##3.The Commissioner
Pollachi Municipality
Pollachi Town
Coimbatore Dist 642 001. ...Respondents in both W.P.Nos.
Prayer in W.P.No.21463 of 2016: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for
the records culminated in Rc.Lr.No.45529/F3/2010 dated 21.05.2015 passed by
the 2nd respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to
continue implementing the posts and pay scale as revised by the Government in
G.O.Ms.No.338 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 26.08.2010 for the
category of ‘Unskilled’.
Prayer in W.P.No.6025 of 2016: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, directing the respondents
to call for the records relating to the impugned letter issued by the 2nd
respondent in Rc.Lr.No.45529/F3/2010 dated 21/05/2015, quash the same and
consequently direct the respondents to continue implementing the posts and pay
scale as revised by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.338 Finance (Pay Cell)
Department dated 26/08/2010 for the category of ‘Unskilled’.
For Petitioners
in both W.P.Nos. : Mr.Vijayaganesh.S
For Respondents
in both W.P.Nos. : Mr.V.Veluchamy for R1 & R2
Additional Government Pleader
Mr.R.Lakshmi Narayanan for R3
2/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 16/02/2026 03:54:42 pm )
##PAGE3##COMMON ORDER
In these Writ Petitions, the challenge is to the communication dated
21.05.2015 bearing Rc.Lr. No. 45529/F3/2010 issued by the second respondent.
By the said communication, the higher pay fixed in respect of the petitioners
was cancelled, and the pay of the petitioners was refixed in accordance with the
instructions issued therein. Further, it was directed that the excess pay, if any,
arising out of such refixation, should be recovered from the salary of the
petitioners.
2. The petitioners are all Group IV employees serving in the third
respondent Municipality. The petitioners were redesignated as Unskilled
Workers vide G.O.Ms. No. 338/2010, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, and were
granted the revised scale of pay with effect from 18.08.2011. While so, the
second respondent issued the impugned communication.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel
appearing for the respondents.
3/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 16/02/2026 03:54:42 pm )
##PAGE4##4. Admittedly, the petitioners received the revised salary based on the
Government Order, and such revision of pay scale was not on account of any
misrepresentation or fraud played by the petitioners.
5. The writ petitioners are serving as Group IV employees and, therefore,
recovery of excess salary, if any, cannot be effected in view of the legal
principles settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in State of Punjab &
Ors. vs. Rafiq Masih [2015 (4) SCC 334]. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has laid
down the governing principles relating to recovery in paragraph No. 18 of the
judgment, which is extracted hereunder:
“18.It is not possible to postulate all situations of hardship
which would govern employees on the issue of recovery, where
payments have mistakenly been made by the employer, in excess
of their entitlement. Be that as it may, based on the decisions
referred to herein above, we may, as a ready reference, summarise
the following few situa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.