IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice K.RAJASEKAR
PANNEERSELVAM – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRL OP No. 1899 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29-01-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
CRL OP No. 1899 of 2026
Panneerselvam
Petitioner(s)
Vs
The State Rep. by the Inspector of
Police,
Arakkonam Town Police Station,
Ranipet District. Crime No.888 of 2019
Respondent(s)
PRAYER This petition is filed under Section 482 r/w Section 439 of
Cr.P.C.,/Under Section 483(1)(b) of BNSS seeking to modify the conditions
imposed in 1. That the petitioner/A4 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on
executing a Bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each
to the satisfaction of this court among them one must be a Government Servant
and the other surety must be his blood relative in the bail order dated 28.11.2025
in Crl.M.P.No.235 of 2025 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions
Judge, Arakkonam.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Balaji
For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to modify the condition
imposed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/02/2026 03:39:43 pm )
##PAGE2##CRL OP No. 1899 of 2026
in Crl M.P. No.235 of 2025 dated 28.11.2025.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an
innocent and the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam
while granting bail to the petitioner in Crl M.P. No.235 of 2025 dated
28.11.2025, directed him to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with two
sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of this Court among them one
must be a Government servant and the other surety must be his blood relative.
He submits that the petitioner was not able to comply the aforesaid conditions
and he belongs to below poverty line. Hence, he has filed the present
modification petition.
3. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for
the respondent police.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that reasons
stated in the modification petition is acceptable, this Court is inclined to modify
the condition to the effect that the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on
executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each
to the satisfaction of this Court. The other conditions imposed by the lower
Court shall remain intact. It is made clear that, furnishing solvency certificate is
not necessary to execute the bond as directed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/02/2026 03:39:43 pm )
##PAGE3##CRL OP No. 1899 of 2026
5. With the above modification, this Criminal Original Petition is
ordered.
29-01-2026
gbi
Index:Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Internet:Yes
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/02/2026 03:39:43 pm )
##PAGE4##CRL OP No. 1899 of 2026
To
1.The State Rep. by the Inspector of
Police,
Arakkonam Town Police Station,
Ranipet District. Crime No.888 of 2019
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/02/2026 03:39:43 pm )
##PAGE5##CRL OP No. 1899 of 2026
K.RAJASEKAR J.
gbi
CRL OP No. 1899 of
2026
29-01-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/02/2026 03:39:43 pm )
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.